Is the tram system
a waste of money?
This page
exists as an archive. If you would like to discuss this or other local topics
or issues with other visitors to 91Èȱ¬ Nottingham website, please visit our
new .
Millions of
pounds? What a waste of money, which could be spent on other ares
of concern. It would be better to spend the money on improving city
transport. The Thing is, once the tram is up and running I can see
the City Council charging the earth to use it. They say that they
want more people to use city transport, well I think that spending
millions on a tram is the wrong way to go about it. Roads are just
going to be more congested than before.
Craig, Car
Driver
Nottingham
|
Paul Campbell
is spot on with his views of what a tram system can offer Nottingham.
Whilst I was a student in Newcastle upon Tyne the Conservative government
deregulated local transport and the excellent and established integrated
ticketing system collapsed. To the great detriment of the entire
region it became impossible to travel on the Tyne & Wear Metro and
the City Buses using a single ticket. Have a look at the tram, bus
(and metro) networks in the cities of central Europe, for example,
Prague, the capital of the Czech Republic (with a central business
district of a similar size to that of Nottingham's), and you will
quickly see the benefits of integrated ticketing offered by such
schemes. I have lived and worked in the Nottingham area for the
last 11 years and I do not believe that anybody is qualified to
belittle the foresighted efforts embodied by the NET project without
experiencing the benefits of such schemes before making comment.
Peter Lewis
West Bridgford
|
I think any
system which takes cars off the roads has to be a good thing & money
well spent, the real issue should be how to stop even more cars
from taking their place`s once you`ve convinced people to use the
tram service because then we`ed be back to square one & all the
poorer for it.
Steve
Hucknall
|
I just wish
that all those people who are complaining about the Tram system
would see beyond their "Dashboard", ditch those cars, especially
the ones with the stupid names -The New Ford P*k! We can't
go on pandering to the whims of whining car drivers, but then again
if you enjoy sitting in a £10,000 car going about 3 mph down the
A4757575??? then go ahead...
Raid 'e'
hater
nottingham
|
I think the
new trams are a great idea. No doubt when they built the railways,
there was a lot of disruption, and there will be a lot of upheaval
before the trams get underway, but think of the long term benefits.
Let's just hope that they send the tram drivers to charm school
before they start driving - it would be so pleasant to be acknowledged
when you thank them at the end of your journey. Unlike many of the
local bus drivers - a surly lot, with a few notable exceptions!
Car owner who goes into work in the city on the bus!
A Polite Bus User
Nottingham
|
Any addition
and improvement to the public transport in Nottingham must be a
good thing. Once the trams are established, the authorities should
look very hard at extending them outside the city in various directions
to cover a much wider area. Also, I would like to see more rail
lines being laid or re-opened and small and fast commuter trains
being used as well. People will only leave their cars behind if
the public transport offers them reliability, comfort, speed and
will take them to exactly where they want to go. Good, efficient
public transport is definitely the future, not just for Nottingham,
but for everywhere.
Debbie Blake
Stapleford, Nottingham
|
I was interested
in statement by one correspondent that in Sheffield the tram has
taken people out of the city centre. Perhaps, but isn't it more
likely that Sheffield's biggest threat was Meadowhall, which despite
being on the tram, owes most of its success to its location next
to the M1? If Nottingham is to compete it needs to make its centre
easily accessible. Assuming we don't wish to see even more cars
on the roads then we need attractive alternatives. Many ideas suggested
here, such as improvements to bus and rails services are good and
are currently being considered. However, the tram does have certain
advantages on certain routes. It will pass many residential areas
and 'park and ride' schemes, allowing drivers to leave their cars.
It is unlikley that buses would be fast enough to encourage this
transition. Equally the tram offers a range of city centre stops
whereas trains only offer one - which isn't particuluarly central.
The tram does not duplicate the Robin Hood line, it inter-connects
with it, hence improving the affectiveness of both services. Finally,
line one is only a starting point. It will be the most difficult
to build as it provides the backbone of the network. However, providing
future extensions to other parts of the city will ba a lot easier.
In a decade from now, NET could well be the prefered way to travel
in Nottingham.
John
Mapperley
|
It's simply
a waste of money, The bus service in the areas the tram will operate
is totally adequate. In my opinion it would add to the congestion,
and create more confusion to other road user's and pedestrians alike.
Paul
Long Eaton, Nottingham
|
First of all,
congratulations on the new site - it looks great and is very informative.
Also, it's good to have a new opportunity to hear people's views
about the tram, which have been very balanced. In response to some
of the points raised so far …
1) The tram runs for 10km of its 14km length alongside the Robin
Hood Line. This route was chosen for its low car ownership, high
public transport use and because it provides a new link for disadvantaged
former coalfield communities and inner city areas. The Robin Hood
Line services are not being duplicated, they are being complemented
by a new form of public transport which provides an entirely different
service to trains by carrying more people more frequently to more
places. It gets people around within urban areas, rather than ferrying
them between urban communities, and as such, will enhance the Robin
Hood Line services. Once Line One has proved its worth - which it
will - we will have a better case for developing future lines…
2) We are looking into the feasibility of new lines to create a
network, with consultants working right now to determine where future
lines could go. Options being considered include lines south of
the river towards West Bridgford and Clifton, west towards Beeston
and east towards Gedling.
3) Evidence from tram systems developed elsewhere shows that there
is a likelihood that house prices will rise as the areas the tram
passes through benefit from its regenerative qualities.
4) Hyson Green, which will of course suffer probably the worst of
the inevitable disruption, is set to be the area which gains the
most in the long-term, both from having a first class public transport
system on its doorstep, linking it with the city centre and enabling
it to recreate itself as an even more vibrant community.
5) One correspondent asks whether cars can be banned from the city
centre. The City Council is creating a 'Clear Zone' at the heart
of the city, which initially restricts the vehicles allowed to travel
through it, which includes the tram, of course. Eventually, it is
hoped the heart of Nottingham will be a zero-emissions zone.
6) The tram will be given priority on the streets, and if its path
is ever blocked, the operator has powers to move whatever is in
the way. Finally, the work which is currently being carried out
on the streets is to move utility services away from the path of
the tram - so any work in the future won't be disrupting tram services
once they're up and running in November 2003!
Stephen
Barker
NET communications manager
Nottingham
|
I have read
all the comments with intrest. I see that the Tram is only serving
one particular section of the city and not one of the sections that
suffer the worst with traffic each day,such as the Mansfield Road
(A60) or Clifton Bridge for example. I can also see huge holdups
at tramstops as passengers go into the road to get on and off the
vehicle, unless of course lorries and cars will be banned from using
these routes. Would it not have been better to consider an underground
system? I relaise how costly this would be,but over the years it
can be extended and it can be built with less disruption of the
public at large.
Thomas
Arnold
|
I think the
tram will be worth while in the long run but I do not approve of
the traffic comotion it is causing. I go to Nottingham Girls High
Shool and it will be absolute horror for people like me trying to
get to school as they are posting one of the stops near our school.
Humah Akram
12
Wollaton, Nottingham
|
It is important
that Nottingham moves on with the tram system and gets lines south
of the river. We can not go on building more and more roads and
having more and more congestion. This just wastes millions of pounds
of public money, causes more deaths and pollution and brings us
ugly roads that spoil the city. Many other cities are now having
trams and Nottingham must not get left behind.
John Smith
Nottingham
|
I think the
arrival of the tram is long overdue. It will be great for the image
of the city and offer a real alternative to driving into the city.
I would like to see the development of the additonal lines as soon
as possible as the current proposed line still excludes much of
the population of Nottingham.
Reg Wood
Nottingham
|
It has been
said that the new system will not affect the Robin Hood Line in
spite of it running along the same route from Hucknall. The explanation
has been that it is complementary to the existing rail system, but
if it takes passengers from the rail has a survey been carried out
to establish what contribution the passengers from Hucknall Bulwell
cuurently make to the running costs of the Robin Hood Line and whether
there is a critical point for the loss of those passengers which
may put the rail line in jeopardy?
Harry
Mansfield
|
I think anything
that will improve the public transport service in Nottingham is
a good thing. Today it took me 1 hour to do 8 miles into Nottingham
- last week it took half that time at most. I can only assume this
was due to children going back to school and parents driving them.
I would suggest that the tram system should link up with Park and
Ride services to enable car drivers to park outside the city. Cinderhill
would be an ideal site for the future. My experience of trams in
other countries, e.g. Bern in Switzerland is that once they're fully
implemented and integrated with other transport services then they
are very effective.
Kevin
Nottingham
|
Even if the
tram only duplicates the robin hood line for only 4 of its 14km
length, it still means that a large proportion of the potential
customer base will have the choice of 4 modes of transport, (tram,
bus, train or private.) Surely a better route would have been from
Clifton, one of the largest council estates in Europe, through the
Meadows, into the centre of the city. Althought it is too late now
to complain, or to change anything as we are now already commited
to the NET, having just the one line does seem to be about as much
use as a chocolate fireguard.
Neville Mellors
Nottingham
|
HAVING TO COMMUTE
BY CAR EVERY DAY, FROM MANSFIELD TO QUEENS DRIVE , I WOULD DEARLY
LOVE AN ALTERNATIVE TO SITTING IN TRAFFIC JAMS . A MODERN CITY LIKE
NOTTINGHAM NEEDS TO CONSTANTLY REVIEW ITS INFRASTRUCTURE. THREE
CHEERS FOR A FORWARD THINKING LOCAL AUTHORITY I SAY. Name - Location
-
MALCOLM EVANS
Mansfield, Notts, England
|
Many people
have commented about the duplication of the Robin Hood Line and
NET tram route. Remember that the Robin Hood Line is a heavy rail
system serving a wider route through Kirkby, Mansfield, Shirebrook
to Worksop and connections beyond. Robin Hood line stations are
limited in number as trains cannot start and stop so easily as trams.
A full Robin Hood Line train only carries about 200 passengers every
30 minutes. The tram can cope with many hundreds at 10 minute frequencies
with many more choice of tram stops. From Basford the tram will
run "on street" through to the City Centre. You can't do that on
the Robin Hood Line. Give the system a chance. I know that other
potential routes are already being investigated !!
Steve Dance
Nottingham
|
Moan moan moan
moan moan whine whine whine whine. "The money could be better spent
on this and this and this..." Well how about that nice widescreen
TV in your front room? You could sell that and give the money to
a homeless person, and that lovely "little runner" you have that
cost a few thousand bob, swop that for a nice little cortina and
give the money left over to buying a few beds for the NHS. Good
idea hey? Isn't it good to know that you anti-tram people are not
just moaning and whining but out there helping the community. Well
Done!!
Annoyed future
tram user
Nottingham
|
The new tram
system is a good idea for Nottingham. There do be seem to be some
glaring ommissions from the planned routes however. A line should
run around the Nottingham ring road, with 'cannot afford to miss'
fare tarrifs. Another line should be run along Mansfield Road as
well.
Graham Shepherd
Nottingham
|
I have seen
the tram schemes in Germany where they are really benefit to the
towns that they serve. The idea of buses dropping passengers at
a tram point outside the city centre & the tram carrying people
across town (passengers using 1 ticket) sounds good to me. Lets
see the tram network extended down to the Beeston/Long Eaton side
of the city.
Graham
Beeston
|
Hi from a city
where the trolley buses run. They are clean, quiet and cheap - What
are you complaing about, would you rather carry on with the dirty
smelly diesal buses you have now! or have a few disruptions and
clean air - at least Nottingham is trying to do something to clean
up their city.
Sharon
Wellington, New Zealand
|
Nottingham,could
really show all these tram schemes how to really change things.
Rather than use rails, why don't we use trolley buses, like in Seattle.
It would mean that in we would not have a system that is fixed by
rails. IE: a buse travelling from say Ilkeston or Long Eaton could
travel to a set point switch off the diesel engine, and connect
to overhead lines. And after a few years the council could legislate
to say no buses can enter the inner city that are not "Dual Fuel"
electric/diesel. This works in Seattle & San Fransico for years.
Paul
Nuthall
|
This page exists
as an archive. If you would like to discuss this or other local topics
or issues with other visitors to 91Èȱ¬ Nottingham website, please visit
our new .
Shout Archive Pages:
[9] [8]
[7]
[6]
[5]
[4]
[3] [2] [1]
|