Background
Before 1932, the Irish Free State and Britain were close trading partners.
90 per cent of all Irish agricultural exports went to Britain and Ireland was dependent on British coal.
However, in 1932, the Irish Free State and Britain began what became known as the Economic War.
It was to have far-reaching consequences for both countries - and for Northern Ireland.
Reasons for the Economic War
Land annuities
Question
What were land annuities?
In the past, Britain had made loans to Irish tenant farmerA farmer who didn鈥檛 own their land but rented from a landowner.to help them buy their land.
Land annuities were repayments of those loans.
An important reason for the dispute was 脡amon de Valera鈥檚 refusal to send land annuitiesIn the past, Britain had made loans to Irish tenant farmers to help them buy their land. Land annuities were repayments of those loans. to Britain.
They were worth 拢5 million per year.
In June 1932, de Valera stopped the payments - made by the Dublin Government since 1922 - because:
- Fianna F谩ilAn anti Anglo-Irish Treaty party when founded by 脡amon de Valera in 1926, Fianna F谩il has held power for most of the years since 1932. had promised to do this in its election manifestoA written statement that describes the policies and opinions of a political party or candidate..
- They were a drain on the Free State's limited resources at a time of world economic Great DepressionA global economic crisis that started in 1929 in the USA. It led to mass unemployment and hardship throughout the 1930s..
- He wanted to use the savings to revive the weak economy.
- In 1925, Northern Ireland had been allowed to retain its annuities and de Valera felt that the Irish Free State should be treated the same.
In addition, de Valera refused to continue to pay the pensions of retired RICThe Royal Irish Constabulary was the police force in Ireland from 1822 until 1922 officers and former British civil servants.
Import duties
Angry that de Valera had broken previous financial agreements, London took steps to recover the lost money by imposing a 20 per cent import dutyThe amount of tax that people or businesses had to pay if they imported goods into the country. on all goods from the Free State.
It later imposed quotasA limit on the amount of imports allowed into a country. for livestock.
The Free State retaliated by imposing import duties on goods from Britain and Northern Ireland, including coal, cement, electrical goods, machinery, iron and steel.
De Valera also called a snap election in January 1933 to show the British that the people of the Free State supported his action.
Having won an overall majority, he launched a propagandaPutting forward biased information to persuade people to believe a particular point of view. campaign aimed at increasing support for the actions he was taking to increase the Free State鈥檚 independence.
De Valera's aims during the Economic War
While de Valera knew the economic war would cause financial problems, he hoped it would also bring benefits.
- He thought it might lead to self-sufficient For a country to be able to provide what is needed for itself, without relying on others.(for example, by producing enough wheat and sugar beet in Ireland to fulfil the Irish market) and diversificationWhen farmers undertake non-farming activities to generate more income. in agriculture.
- He wanted to encourage entrepreneurA person who starts their own business..
- If the price of British goods in the Free State increased it might encourage the Irish to open their own businesses to compete with British industry.
- He saw the economic war as part of his political campaign against continued British control.
Effect on the Irish Free State
Negative impact
As 90 per cent of Irish exports went to Britain, the Economic War had a massive impact and the Irish Free State's economy almost collapsed.
Overall, the Economic War cost the Free State about 拢48 million.
This was because:
- The cattle industry, the lifeblood of the economy, was nearly destroyed. A 35 per cent reduction in cattle exports (from 1929 levels), declining prices for beef in Ireland (due to there now being too much of it) and no new export markets being available, meant that many Irish farmers went bankruptWhen an institution, organisation, company or person runs out of money..
- In spite of government subsidiesMoney given by the government or organisation to help a business keep the price of a product or service low. to encourage Irish farmers to grow new crops, there was limited agricultural diversificationWhen farmers undertake non-farming activities to generate more income. because only the larger farms were able to make the switch and there were no markets for new goods.
- De Valera hoped that taxing British goods would encourage the development of Irish industries.
However, this did not really happen due to a lack of investment.
Any new companies set up were not really geared towards exports and as a result:
- Unemployment increased from 29,000 in 1931 to 138,000 in 1935.
- The trade deficitWhen a country is not making enough money from the goods it trades. increased as exports declined from 拢750,000 to 拢500,000 per year.
- The cost of living increased and the standard of living fell.
- There was a chronic shortage of coal.
- There were cutbacks in electricity generation and rail transport.
- emigrationThis is when people are leaving or exiting a country. increased.
- There were very few new industries due to lack of investmentMoney or capital put into a business for profitable returns, for example interest or income..
Positive impact
At the same time, the lack of coal coming from Britain led to a period of growth in the local peatA dark brown or black substance which resembles soil. It is dug up (cut), dried out and then sold for fuel or as a fertiliser. industry and small-scale farmers were helped by the reduction in land annuitiesIn the past, Britain had made loans to Irish tenant farmers to help them buy their land. Land annuities were repayments of those loans. payments.
Additionally, new cement factories were established, whilst the government spent 拢1 million on improving bridges and rural cottages.
Effect on Britain
Britain
- Its share of the Irish Free State market fell from 76 per cent in 1932 to 54 per cent in 1935.
- There was a shortage of imported Irish beef and dairy products.
- There is some evidence that unemployment increased in Britain as a result of the Economic War.
Effect on Northern Ireland
Negative impact
Britain had other markets to rely on, but Northern Ireland did not, and as much of its economic prosperityBecoming well-off, or wealthy. was based on cross-border trade, the economy was severely affected.
- Britain鈥檚 prosperity depended on cross-border trade with the Irish Free State and when this was disrupted, Northern Ireland struggled to find new markets for its goods.
- Its farmers were hurt by the retaliatory import dutyThe amount of tax that people or businesses had to pay if they imported goods into the country. imposed by de Valera and the cross-border boycottRefusing to buy or use the goods or services from a person, country or organisation out of protest..
- smugglingMoving goods illegally from one place to another. increased.
Positive impact
At the same time, Northern Ireland鈥檚 farmers benefited because they provided Britain with goods that were no longer being supplied by the Irish Free State.
How the Economic War ended
In 1935, Britain and the Irish Free State signed the Coal-Cattle PactA 1935 agreement which saw Britain lower its import tax on Irish beef and the Irish Free State lower its import tax on British coal. which eased some of the economic pressures.
However, financial problems continued which had a negative impact on political relations.
British Prime Minister, Neville Chamberlain, wanted to improve relations with Dublin.
To make this happen he decided to:
- Bring the Economic War to an end.
- Resolve the issue of the treaty portsThree ports at Berehaven, Cobh and Lough Swilly which Britain controlled under the terms of the Anglo-Irish Treaty. These were later transferred to 脡ire under the terms of the Anglo Irish Agreements, 1938.. Chamberlain realised their strategic importance, but he also knew that they were out of date and he felt that good relations with Britain鈥檚 nearest neighbour were more important.
Chamberlain hoped that if these matters were dealt with, Anglo-Irish relations would improve and 脡ire would assist Britain if a war broke out.
From de Valera鈥檚 point of view, getting the treaty ports back would make it easier to declare the country neutralNot favouring either side in an argument or conflict. in the event of a war.
In January 1938, therefore, negotiation began.
In April 1938, three Anglo-Irish Agreements were signed which ended the Economic War and settled a number of old grievances.
The Anglo-Irish Agreements, 1938
The terms of the Anglo-Irish Agreements, 1938 covered finance, trade and defence.
Finance
land annuitiesIn the past, Britain had made loans to Irish tenant farmers to help them buy their land. Land annuities were repayments of those loans. were ended.
脡ire made a one-off payment of 拢10 million to Britain in settlement of all claims, instead of the 拢78 million owed.
Trade
Britain and 脡ire removed all import dutyThe amount of tax that people or businesses had to pay if they imported goods into the country. which had been placed on each other鈥檚 goods during the previous five years.
Both countries guaranteed better treatment of each other鈥檚 exports for three years, although some quotasA limit on the amount of imports allowed into a country. and tariffA tax or charge placed on imported or exported goods and services. still existed.
脡ire was allowed to impose duties on a number of imports from Britain to protect its new industries.
Defence
Britain returned the treaty portsThree ports at Berehaven, Cobh and Lough Swilly which Britain controlled under the terms of the Anglo-Irish Treaty. These were later transferred to 脡ire under the terms of the Anglo Irish Agreements, 1938. to 脡ire without conditions.
Impact in Britain, Northern Ireland and 脡ire
Whilst the Anglo-Irish Agreements, 1938 were not a complete success for everyone, most people responded favourably because Anglo-Irish relations improved and the Economic War ended.
In Britain
Britain gained financially from the Agreements, but lost out in terms of defence because 脡ire did not allow Britain to use the treaty portsThree ports at Berehaven, Cobh and Lough Swilly which Britain controlled under the terms of the Anglo-Irish Treaty. These were later transferred to 脡ire under the terms of the Anglo Irish Agreements, 1938. during World War Two.
Winston Churchill, a senior British politician who would later become Prime Minister, had warned that this might happen, but Chamberlain had acted on the advice of his military chiefs.
Chamberlain was disappointed when de Valera responded to the return of the treaty ports by asking for a declaration against partition/partitionedThe division of a country into two regions., which the British refused to give.
In 脡ire
Anglo-Irish relations improved.
The one-off land annuitiesIn the past, Britain had made loans to Irish tenant farmers to help them buy their land. Land annuities were repayments of those loans. payment of 拢10 million to Britain meant there was an extra 拢5 million per year to spend in 脡ire.
The return of the treaty portsThree ports at Berehaven, Cobh and Lough Swilly which Britain controlled under the terms of the Anglo-Irish Treaty. These were later transferred to 脡ire under the terms of the Anglo Irish Agreements, 1938. removed another link to Britain.
This increased 脡ire鈥檚 independence and made neutralNot favouring either side in an argument or conflict. during World War Two possible.
However, the continuation of partition/partitionedThe division of a country into two regions. was a severe disappointment.
De Valera called a general election in which the voters showed their approval of the Agreements by returning Fianna F谩ilAn anti Anglo-Irish Treaty party when founded by 脡amon de Valera in 1926, Fianna F谩il has held power for most of the years since 1932. to power with a comfortable majority.
In Northern Ireland
Relations between Northern Ireland and 脡ire worsened and partition/partitionedThe division of a country into two regions. was strengthened because the dispute increased unionistA person who believes the union between Britain and Northern Ireland should continue. suspicion, hostility and fears.
Unionists felt the return of the treaty portsThree ports at Berehaven, Cobh and Lough Swilly which Britain controlled under the terms of the Anglo-Irish Treaty. These were later transferred to 脡ire under the terms of the Anglo Irish Agreements, 1938. weakened the security of the British Isles and they feared the next step would be the reunification of Ireland.
Chamberlain tried to calm Craigavon by making concessions on agricultural subsidiesMoney given by the government or organisation to help a business keep the price of a product or service low. and with the promise of an increased share of weapons manufacture.
The Agreements did not end the cross-border boycottRefusing to buy or use the goods or services from a person, country or organisation out of protest..
Northern nationalistPeople who believe their country should be independent from other nations. For example, Irish nationalists, who want Ireland to be fully independent of Britain. were disappointed that the talks between Chamberlain and de Valera did not result in an end to partition.
WATCH: The Economic War
Test your knowledge
More on Changing relations: Northern Ireland and its neighbours, 1920-49
Find out more by working through a topic
- count4 of 8