91Èȱ¬

Red Bull have been forced to change a design feature on their cars after governing body the FIA decided that it broke the rules.

Red Bull had holes in the front axles that channelled air through the wheels for an aerodynamic advantage.

But the FIA said they contravened rules outlawing moveable aerodynamic devices.

It is the second change forced on Red Bull by the FIA in as many weeks after they had to modify their floor before this weekend's race in Canada.

91Èȱ¬ Sport understands that on arrival at the Canadian GP, FIA race director Charlie Whiting felt that the holes in the Red Bull axles - which have been on the car since the start of the season - were also illegal.

They worked by taking air that was coming into the brake duct and

He demanded changes, which Red Bull made by blocking off the holes ahead of running in final practice and qualifying on Saturday.

Whiting felt the parts were illegal under article 3.15 of the technical regulations.

This dictates that "any specific part of the car that influences its aerodynamic performance… must remain immobile in relation to the spring part of the car".

As the axle is by definition not immobile because it rotates with the wheel, and as in this case is influencing the aerodynamics, the holes were declared to be against the rules.

91Èȱ¬ F1 technical analyst Gary Anderson said: "The Red Bull has holes through the axle, which is titanium, which line up with holes in the wheels.

"High-energy air is channeled from the brake ducts into the holes and helps cool the brakes and improve the performance of the underfloor.

"But apparently it's been seen as illegal because it's a moving aerodynamic device."

The issue with the floor blew up at the Monaco Grand Prix, where rivals McLaren, Ferrari, Mercedes and Lotus objected to the holes on the basis that they broke rules dictating that the floor has to remain "impervious".

The holes in the floor were on the Red Bull when they won the Bahrain and Monaco Grands Prix with Sebastian Vettel and Mark Webber.

But the team have rejected claims that they had won with an illegal car, saying that it was legal at the time and had only been declared not so afterwards.