91热爆

Summary

  • The Supreme Court has heard three days of argument over whether Boris Johnson acted lawfully in suspending Parliament

  • A decision from the court is due 鈥渆arly next week鈥

  • The judges have heard two appeals: one by campaigner Gina Miller's team and one by the government, contesting a Scottish court ruling that the decision was unlawful

  • The government says prorogation is not a matter for the courts

  • Ex-PM Sir John Major argued Parliament was suspended to stop MPs interfering with Brexit

  • A written government submission to the court suggests it could seek another prorogation if it loses the case

Live Reporting

Martha Buckley, Becky Morton, Matt Cannon and Joseph Lee

  1. What's happening today?

    Here's who we will hear from today:

    • 10:30 - 11:00 BST: Oral intervention by Scottish Government (Lord Advocate)
    • 11:00 - 11:40: Oral intervention by NI victims' campaigner Raymond McCord (Ronan Lavery QC)
    • 11:40 - 12:10: Oral intervention by Counsel General for Wales (Mike Fordham QC)
    • 12:10 - 12:30: Oral intervention by Sir John Major (Lord Garnier QC)
    • 14:00 - 14:30: Appellants reply in Cherry case (Lord Keen QC)
    • 14:30 - 15:00: Miller appellants reply (Lord Pannick QC)

  2. Good morning

    Welcome to day three of our coverage of the Supreme Court, which is hearing challenges to the PM's prorogation - suspension - of Parliament.

    The 11 senior judges are hearing two different appeals over the prorogation - one from the English High Court and one from the Scottish Court of Session.

    During the opening two days, lawyers for the government and campaigners clashed over whether or not prorogation is a matter for the courts.

    Today, the judges are expected to hear submissions from those who have been given permission to intervene in the appeals, including former prime minister Sir John Major.

    The session gets under way at 10:30 BST.