 |
 |
Causing death by dangerous driving whilst under the influence
of drink carries a max penalty of 10 years imprisonment
Drink-driving
fatalities:
1976 - 1,600+ deaths
1999 - 460 deaths
2000 - 520 deaths
2001 - 480 deaths
In Greater Manchester, positive breath tests
fell by 14% in 2002. But arrests rose
by 26%
The new drink drive TV campaign
is aimed at 17 - 24 year old men. |
|
 |
|
From
91Èȱ¬ Manchester: Have
your say on:
Gun crime
Trafford
Centre
Student
fees
Metrolink
M60
Myra Hindley
Fire strike |
|
 |
|
The 91Èȱ¬ is not responsible for the content
of external websites. |
|
 |
|
|
19-year-old
Aaron O'Reilly, of Grange Grove, Whitefield, had drunk vodka and other
spirits when he got behind the wheel of a Ford Sierra one fateful
night back in March 2002.
He had no licence, no insurance and had never had a driving lesson.
Yet he drove at speeds of up to 90mph, on the wrong side of the road,
before crashing head-on with a taxi.
THINK! drink drive TV ad |
The
cab driver, Khalid Ejaz, of Grange Avenue, Coppice in Oldham - a
father of ten - was killed instantly. His passenger Stella Shaw,
of Brookfields in Prestwich, died in hospital. O'Reilly's 15-year-old
Stepbrother, Arron Croft, of Windsor Avenue, Whitefield, a passenger
in the Sierra, was pronounced dead at the scene.
Tests later revealed O'Reilly probably had about two-and-a-half
times the legal level of alcohol in his blood at the time of the
crash. He admitted causing death by dangerous driving, excess alcohol
and document offences and was jailed for four-and-a-half years.
The maximum sentence for causing death by dangerous driving carries
a maximum penalty of ten years.
Not surprisingly, the relatives of hs victims said they were "disgusted"
at the sentence.
Are drink drivers getting away with murder?
Should they be given stiffer sentences? Or is education the answer?
How can society rid itself of drink-driving? Have
your say >>>
From
mark lavelle in bolton
Why do you consistantly place thugs into the 'drink driving ' category.
This person was more than capable of causing this whilst being sober!
The only difference is that if he were then there would not have been
such attention.
From
john in pendlebury
I got a ban for drink driving; the re-habilitation opened my eyes.
I believe the unit content of all drinks should be clearly labelled
by law; then no one would have an excuse. There is no answer to 'high
risk' offenders ; they often continue to drive after a further ban.
Prison then must be the answer. The drink drive limit should be the
same 3 units limit as our more responsible European neighbours. Let
the police breath test without the current restrictions. Any alcohol,
affects your judgement when driving. Give the courts the power to
give those people who make these wreckless choices long sentences.
Ban them from driving for life.
From
Rich in Salford
I think that tougher punishments are the answer. People know the dangers
of drink driving and that it causes death. People know it is a crime
but some people are willing to take the risk. If the risk of being
caught was very serious punishment I think this would stop many people.
There need to be more police patrols as well randomly testing people,
not just at Christmas. This gives the wrong signal in my opinion.
Im shocked when I visit Lancaster. I see many more police vehicles
on the road compared to a large city like Manchester.
From
John McKeown in Tewkesbury
Whether it is murder has to be determined case by case; in the example
given it's equivalent to bombing a pub - the perpetrator doesn't know
whether anyone will be killed or who, but it's likely. I agree that
the maximum penalty should be Life - but the current maximum penalty
isn't being used so yes moral education of the judiciary is also important.
From
Brian Bliss, Colorado, USA
It will not be long until you see the gangs taking up cars as their
weapon of choice as the penalties are far less than if someone would
have used a gun for the same purpose. The current penalties for this
type of offense is embarassing. Like crimes deserve like punishment.
From
olivia, woodrdge USA
I think they are getting away with murder! they no what it is coming
to when you drink then head out on the road! drinkers know whats going
to happen if they drive drunk! So why let them go! They Killed sombody
just like other murders! Can you please send me some more information
at this email adresses im doing a report on this for school! thanks!
From
Brian Wellings, Farnworth, Bolton
when people past their driving test they should be restricted to driving
small engine cars for a period of 2 years and put on probation with
threat of licence being withdrawn for motoring offences. Drink drivers
have no excuse for their behaviour and should be tried for manslaughter
or murder.
From
Rebecca Johnson in Manchester
I think that the justice system in this country is terrible. How
can the law get their priorities wrong? The criminal took 3 lives!!!!
If you call a 4 and a half year sentence for someone like O'Reilly
justice, you're not thinking straight. The law has to judge fairly,
and bring people to justice, but it seems to have failed in carrying
out this task.I do not call a 4 and a half year sentence for a drunken
idiot without a licence and insurance who killed 3 people justice.
I really don't think the law took his character into account well
enough. Everyone knows it is wrong to drink-drive especially without
licence or insurance.How they failed to recognise this is highly questionable.
The lad knew what he was getting himself into so he should expect
punishment - but his punishment is not good enough. It does NOT give
the families or friends of the victims any justice.
From
Vicky in Stockport
They are getting away with murder. A car is a leathal weapon.
Maybe the police should concentrate more on catching the drink drivers
rather than the easy targets of drivers speeding eg: 35mph in a 30mph
zone. People get drunk or drive whether thay have insurance/licesnse
or not & hurt, maim or kill someone deserve to have the book thrown
at them. Again it seems to be simple case of the judicial system being
too lenient in the past & now there are problems with the increased
traffic on the roads. Same goes for those who steal cars. What's the
point in banning them? They drive anyway. Lock them up & throw away
the key.
From
J Smith in London
BRING BACK THE BIRCH AND HARD LABOUR IN PRISONS FOR THESE TYPE OF
OFFENCES. CRIME WOULD DROP OVERNIGHT.
From
Andrew king, manchester
Have more police patrols.
From
Jon Lord, Knutsford
Of course they are getting away lightly for quite horrendous crimes.
Our society has been run for too long on the basis of imbecile liberal
ideas in respect of crime and punishment. We tend to ask where society
went wrong in producing someone as vile as this murderer rather than
endeavouring to inculcate in all a due respect for others and a structure
of punishment that makes it clear that the perpertrators' rights are
matched by their reponsibilities. Until this changes, tragedies like
this will continue.
|
