Exam results not restricted by Data Protection Act
Great news. You may recall that last summer I complained that Oxford University had refused to tell what classes of degree each of the Miliband brothers has.
They couldn't tell me for "data protection reasons", the press officer said when I phoned him.
However, a reader, David Mason has been in contact with the Information Commissioner's office, the body which looks after the Data Protection Act. And they have told him that degree results are not covered by the DPA. Nor, it seems, are GCSEs and A-levels.
Tim Clarke of the commissioner's office has told Mr Mason:
"The publication of degree classes (and examination results in general) is a common and accepted practice and accordingly the DPA98 (Data Protection Act 1998) would not prevent this.
"However, the DPA98 still means that data controllers have to ensure processing is fair, and should consider carefully requests from students that their personal data is not published."
So a small victory for freedom of information.
Whether that makes Oxford University and other academic institutions behave any more sensibly is another matter.
We can only hope.
Comment number 1.
At 11th May 2011, JunkkMale wrote:Credit where due.
If finding out, yet again, that 'official munchkins' are either inept or will lie through their teeth is depressingly par for the course.
One presumes this person will not be subject to any consequences?
That all said, I rather fear my reassurance that anything of importance would be left in the hands of a PPE grad, at any level, is not high.
But when the hoo-haa du jour seems to be 'certain' folk swinging 'certain' gigs based more on who they and theirs 'know' than actual achievements, the relative stature of same does become relevant.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 1)
Comment number 2.
At 11th May 2011, stevie wrote:do they also have a register for Bullingdon boys who stole from the Tucke Shoppe and did not recognise Mater and Pater on school sports day.....
Complain about this comment (Comment number 2)
Comment number 3.
At 11th May 2011, barriesingleton wrote:"HOO-HAA DU JOUR" (#1)
While England still lays claim to such coinage Junkk, the ignorant hoards of foreigndom will never claim this land.
Sing lad - SING!
Complain about this comment (Comment number 3)
Comment number 4.
At 11th May 2011, barriesingleton wrote:TOO CLOSE FOR COMFORT (#2)
Oh stevie - did you catch 'All in the Mind' this week. There is little doubt that the trauma, to little minds, consequent to being sent to the Public Gulag, creates (or exacerbates) the monster-minds who claw their way to the top of Westminster governance. I don't know if Dickens sketched in Flashman's early life, but I am in no doubt he was not a happy little bunny in those tender years.
We have the knowledge - but not the wisdom to apply it. No one of real stature can breathe in Westminster's miasma.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 4)
Comment number 5.
At 11th May 2011, maxu wrote:Frankly I am a bit surprised you have had any problem with this.
When degree results are published in Oxford they are posted in full outside the exam schools. The individual colleges will also publish them in the college register for that particular year- for example if you go to the Exeter College Register for 2003 you will find my results.
In the case of Corpus Christi, the Milibands' college, the college register is called the "Pelican Record" (or something like that- it definitely has "Pelican", the college symbol, in it). It is a public document so simply go the Bodleian library, or indeed the British Library, and order it up from the stack for the relevant years.
The explanation for their refusal to tell you maybe for a number of reasons but charitably it is worth pointing out that in recent years it has been possible to opt out in advance of the results' publication from having them posted outside exam schools. The official may not have wanted to give out the results because he would be unable to find out whether the Milibands' had specifically requested that their results should not be published in this way, but this only applies to recent results (since the DPA 1998) so their own results would have been published whether they liked it or not.
It is also possible that the official simply did not see why he should do your work for you when it is actually relatively easy to obtain the results with a little research as described above!
Complain about this comment (Comment number 5)
Comment number 6.
At 11th May 2011, jauntycyclist wrote:is the bbc any better? they are still employing marr who must now be as useful in questioning as wet matches?
Complain about this comment (Comment number 6)
Comment number 7.
At 11th May 2011, Sasha Clarkson wrote:PPE is one of those courses where the title of the degree matters less than the options taken, and the class of the degree should be judged in this light too.
Certain options are rather more difficult and rigorous than others!
For some, PPE seems to be an initiation into the priesthood of our ruling class. I strongly advised the daughter of a friend NOT to apply for it once, saying that it was the kind of degree taken by those who wanted to boss others about without acquiring any useful skills. My friend just laughed and said something like "that's my girl!"
In the sixties and seventies some very heavyweight politicians were PPE graduates, Heath and Healey to name two. But these gentlemen also had creditable war records, and had experience of life's more unpleasant realities.
Most of the modern lot have never got their hands dirty in any real job.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 7)
Comment number 8.
At 11th May 2011, Januaria wrote:# 3 barriesingleton!
Steady on old bean! 'Foreigndom'? Are MARZIPAN scotties safe from your weasely intent?
# 1. 'inept or will lie'
The nature of the beast: honesty and politics = uncomfortable bedfellows.
The only hope is for ethics to rear it's head above the parapet.
My solution would be therapeutic poetry readings in the House as part of a holistic healing 'transparent initiative' to help mend the aberrant psyche within ...
Complain about this comment (Comment number 8)
Comment number 9.
At 11th May 2011, barriesingleton wrote:A WAY WITH MARZIPAN (THE NOO)!
The Minster Monster psyche is a hell of a huge beastie Januaria. Better to work some marzipan magic on the structure of the Palace of Westminster, and let it slowly slump, entombing the whole dastardly crew.
Ye ken?
Complain about this comment (Comment number 9)
Comment number 10.
At 11th May 2011, barriesingleton wrote:THE ELEPHANT JUST STOOD THERE - PROBABLY TERRIFIED
The Slut wrangle ran its course, without one mention of alcohol or 'releasers of sexual behaviour'. Do the 91Èȱ¬ not use researchers any more?
I could write a little piece, but opinionated women know far more about men than I ever will (heard Bea Campbell today). I know my place.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 10)
Comment number 11.
At 12th May 2011, jonathanbw wrote:Can I suggest that you try the following:
1. Establish the Millibands' ages (and hence dates at which the brothers took their degrees).
2. Go to decent Library (I understand there are several in London).
3. Call up back copies of 'The Times' or any other broadsheet for the Summer of that year.
4. Look for results of relevant exams.
5. Make note of same.
It would require some effort and resource (perhaps half a day of a reasonably competent researcher's time) and of course it won't lead to any information that comes remotely close to providing an interesting story; nor will it place any burden on the overstretched Freedom of Information industry (which we all pay for) or Oxford University staff.
It will be easier, too, than finding out how much of the licence fee will be trousered by whichever 'performer' from the Beeb's stellar 'talent' roster presents the Eurovision Song Contest at the weekend....
And it's most unlikely that it will be obstructed by a 'superinjunction' of the kind so popular amongst senior 91Èȱ¬ journalists.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 11)
Comment number 12.
At 12th May 2011, Januaria wrote:#10 Glad to hear it. [if it makes you feel better, write the damned piece ....]
YO! Amazonia-sul-windswept
Not so long ago a prospective employer could ring up and request confirmation of an applicant's degree in toto. This information was freely given, enabling merit and ability to be unquestioned . All qualifications must be open to scrutiny.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 12)
Comment number 13.
At 12th May 2011, Dee wrote:Pretty sure its a non-issue - both Miliband's were pretty open about their degrees.
David got a first - hence him getting a Kennedy Scholarship straight after.
Ed got a 2.1 - read somewhere he was pretty gutted, went to the lse after then went to Harvard for a year to teach Government and 'get the academia out of his system.'
Exam results aren't private really. Often GCSEs and A levels are published. If I politician gives a false account then the Universities should be obliged to release a statement highlighting their dishonesty.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 13)
Comment number 14.
At 12th May 2011, JunkkMale wrote:'10. At 23:45pm 11th May 2011, barriesingleton
Do the 91Èȱ¬ not use researchers any more? "
One is pretty sure they do... and legions of them.
/blogs/newsnight/michaelcrick/2011/03/on_the_lib_dems_slump_in_barns.html
Who needs Google*?
However, experience shows they tend to be quite savvy on what can, and should not be discovered... if they know what's good for them, and us. And in case they do so, there are of course further levels of editorial to ensure proper omission.
*There is, always, a default that cannot be fought:
Complain about this comment (Comment number 14)
Comment number 15.
At 12th May 2011, barriesingleton wrote:DISHONESTY SEEMS TO BE A DEGREE SUBJECT FOR POLITICIANS (#13)
I have posted before to the effect that Westminster 'politics' comprises: The art of self deception, wrapped in the craft of deceiving others for their own good.
This is compounded by the fact that they APPROVE and APPLAUD each other's practise of the art and craft. Small wonder ten, that those who get to the top are utterly without principle. What their poor parents and children have to block their minds to, is beyond imagining.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 15)
Comment number 16.
At 12th May 2011, Januaria wrote:#12 ... of course, that was when a degree was worth getting ...
Complain about this comment (Comment number 16)
Comment number 17.
At 12th May 2011, barriesingleton wrote:DEGREE OF TILT (#16)
Stop going on about degrees - it's degreeist. All I have is a diploma in windmill-tilting from a little known La Mancha institute.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 17)
Comment number 18.
At 12th May 2011, stanilic wrote:Why is a degree considered relevant, whatever its class. I thought these two were labouring people practising socialism and all are equal in socialism. Or have I missed something?
Complain about this comment (Comment number 18)
Comment number 19.
At 12th May 2011, stanilic wrote:17
I know the place, barrie. It is a well regarded institution which issues degrees from the University of Life.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 19)
Comment number 20.
At 12th May 2011, Januaria wrote:This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 20)
Comment number 21.
At 12th May 2011, Januaria wrote:#17 does that matter BS?
I've only got a sistifikate and grade 3 pinao AND a bit of paper which proves I can type (that IS worth getting)
Complain about this comment (Comment number 21)
Comment number 22.
At 12th May 2011, barriesingleton wrote:I ALWAYS WONDERED HOW TO SPELL SISTIFIKATE JAN (#21)
And don't think I missed that use of 'BS'! (:o)
Complain about this comment (Comment number 22)
Comment number 23.
At 12th May 2011, sevenstargreen wrote:18
Yes,you did miss something stanilic,socialism is only for the little people,not for puffed up labour M.Ps.They talk about it (ad nauseum) preach about it,but dont live
their lives singing the Red Flag!!!
Michael,is this blog to go the way of others with the new format? Fight against it! The new (unimproved) format is dire.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 23)
Comment number 24.
At 12th May 2011, stevie wrote:hang on a mo' so it's nine grand for a degree and they are not worth a light....do you think we should tell our poor, underfunded youth...or will they find out for themselves?
Complain about this comment (Comment number 24)
Comment number 25.
At 12th May 2011, barriesingleton wrote:CATCH 23 - KNOWING YOU ARE REALLY DUMB IS QUITE A TRICK (#24)
Old Chinese saying: Those who do the most good are seldom noticed. New British Truth: those who do the most harm are found in Westminster.
No abilities other than, deceit and hypocrisy, are required for high political office. Clearly, academia has noticed.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 25)
Comment number 26.
At 12th May 2011, stanilic wrote:23
We should make them, shouldn't we?
Complain about this comment (Comment number 26)
Comment number 27.
At 12th May 2011, Sasha Clarkson wrote:@17 Barrie - I always thought your comments were rather Quixotic! ;-D
Complain about this comment (Comment number 27)
Comment number 28.
At 13th May 2011, Januaria wrote:#22 SPELLING AND SPOOLING, bs (demoted again)
OFF TOPIC NEWS:
Weston Leisure Dome agogo --- confident that the Nightingale Trop .. bird will morph into THE phoenix.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 28)
Comment number 29.
At 13th May 2011, JakeL31 wrote:So....what class of degree do they both have then?
Complain about this comment (Comment number 29)
Comment number 30.
At 13th May 2011, Sasha Clarkson wrote:Miliband D took a first, Miliband E took an upper second and a Masters in Economics at LSE. It's not difficult to find on the web. The source for Miliband D is the 91Èȱ¬ itself. (So all you needed to do was search the internal database Michael! ;-D )
Complain about this comment (Comment number 30)
Comment number 31.
At 13th May 2011, jedlo wrote:i dont want to cast aspersions on your journalistic ability's but shouldn't you have checked this out and shouldn't you have put in a request to the information commissioner not one of your readers
i hope you are not this easily fobbed of when investigating other story's.....
Complain about this comment (Comment number 31)
Comment number 32.
At 14th May 2011, CASTELLAN wrote:If the shoe fits wear it down to the sole.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 32)