Why Chris Patten got the 91Èȱ¬ job
Some interesting background on Jeremy Hunt's recent decision to pick Chris Patten as his preferred candidate to be the next chairman of the 91Èȱ¬ Trust.
Hunt actually told the Culture Select Committee some months ago that he would prefer the next chairman to come from a non-party background. As a former Chairman of the Conservative Party, Patten doesn't exactly fit that description. But I'm told that after Hunt's statement to the Commons committee the 91Èȱ¬ Director-General Mark Thompson told the Culture Secretary that the 91Èȱ¬ would actually prefer someone from the same party as the government, on the grounds that such individuals tend to try and show their independence of their political colleagues.
That's partly why Patten got the job. Hunt felt that the other leading contender, Richard Lambert, would have been a Michael Lyons Mark II. Patten might lack experience when it comes to new technology, but the Culture Secretary felt that somebody who had stood up to Margaret Thatcher in the '80s, and to the Chinese government in the '90s, would be good at protecting the corporation's interests.
Comment number 1.
At 9th Mar 2011, threnodio_II wrote:The Noble Baroness and the Chinese are an absolute doddle compared with the all pervasive climate of political correctness Mr. Patten will now have to deal with.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 1)
Comment number 2.
At 9th Mar 2011, JunkkMale wrote:'Some interesting background on Jeremy Hunt's recent decision'
Sources say, or horse's mouth?
Anyway,
'good at protecting the corporation's interests"
Nice to have the real priorities straight from the off.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 2)
Comment number 3.
At 9th Mar 2011, TheGingerF wrote:Another leftie at the 91Èȱ¬ - well thats just perfect.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 3)
Comment number 4.
At 9th Mar 2011, U14802339 wrote:All this user's posts have been removed.Why?
Complain about this comment (Comment number 4)
Comment number 5.
At 10th Mar 2011, Smeagol wrote:This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 5)
Comment number 6.
At 10th Mar 2011, Smeagol wrote:Truly a man for all seasons.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 6)
Comment number 7.
At 10th Mar 2011, barriesingleton wrote:WESTMINSTER REGARDS US WITH CONTEMPT AS DOES THE 91Èȱ¬
Mr Patten is 'content' (by acquiescence) within the Westminster Ethos.
Will he bring gravitas in place of edgicrass?
Nuff sed.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 7)
Comment number 8.
At 10th Mar 2011, stevie wrote:he was never a 'real' dyed in the wool Tory, he had issues with Margaret so he could be OK for Auntie....
Complain about this comment (Comment number 8)
Comment number 9.
At 10th Mar 2011, philocleanthes wrote:And of course as a public service broadcaster,'the corporation's interests' are subordinately synonymous with those of the fee paying citizenry.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 9)