Unbeaten Chiefs and the new, relaxed Todd Haley
Each NFL season throws up its fair share of surprises and American football-related shocks don't come much bigger than the
, posting only four victories. But they are already close to matching that total after opening the 2010 season with victories over the San Diego Chargers, Cleveland Browns and San Francisco 49ers.
The real test comes this weekend as this young Chiefs team takes on the reigning AFC champions in the Indianapolis Colts. That will be no easy feat, but Kansas City appear equipped to give the Colts a run for their money.
After a slow start to the season, quarterback Matt Cassel proved his worth with a big performance against the 49ers and he now has to start living up to his
Matt Cassel is working with an improved offence this season
At 1.93m tall and weighing 105kg, Cassel is the prototype size and possesses a very strong arm. He is a good locker-room leader and the Chiefs love his commitment levels and work ethic. But he has been maddeningly inconsistent since moving to KC in 2009.
That could be about to change because Cassel has weapons around him in 2010 that were simply not there last term. The addition of several young players has galvanised the attack and the offensive line looks like a cohesive unit again after three very disappointing years in the doldrums.
Rookie wide receiver Dexter McCluster is an electric jitterbug with speed to burn. He can play several positions and can score from anywhere on the field, as shown by his
establishing themselves as one of the elite ground attack pairings in the league and Dwayne Bowe finally letting his football do the talking from the wide receiver spot, the Chiefs are beginning to take shape on offense.
behind rising young stars such as defensive lineman Glenn Dorsey, outside linebacker Tamba Hali and cornerback Brandon Flowers, perhaps the most startling change has come in the KC coaching ranks.
Todd Haley took charge of an NFL team for the first time in 2009 and marched into Kansas City with a reputation for being a fiery character on the sidelines and on the practice field.
He wanted to prove his worth and took on too much. He wanted to be hands-on in every single department, but he especially couldn't let go of the offensive play-calling duties, which meant he was stretched thin on gamedays.
But Haley's problems ran deeper than that in 2009.
He was probably too fired up and aggressive. He wanted the Chiefs to be better than they were and much quicker than was physically possible.
Todd Haley has relaxed his coaching style for the 2010 campaign
As I mentioned, he came to KC with a reputation for being an assistant coach who was not afraid to tell players they were playing badly. During his spell as offensive coordinator of the Arizona Cardinals, he got into a very public sideline spat with star wide receiver Anquan Boldin during the 2008 NFC Championship Game. He also butted heads with Terrell Owens when he was an assistant with the Dallas Cowboys.
Chiefs fans dubbed and his players were miserable. It is clear things have changed dramatically in 2010.
For a start, Haley did what he should have done from day one and surrounded himself with trusted veteran coaches in the form of Charlie Weis (offensive coordinator) and Romeo Crennel (defensive coordinator). That pair were vital members of Bill Belichick's backroom staff when the New England Patriots were taking the NFL by storm at the start of the new century.
As well as bringing tremendous technical knowledge to the Chiefs, Weis and Crennel bring head coaching experience at Notre Dame University and the Cleveland Browns respectively and have been able to impart some of their wisdom on the much younger Haley.
He has been a much more laid-back figure from the very start of preseason training, even staying for up to an hour after one session to sign autographs and pose for pictures with fans. This is a warmer and fuzzier side to the coach that was rarely seen before.
Haley has been more tolerant of his players, he has become a more patient teacher and he has been increasingly relaxed due to not being pulled in so many directions, especially on gamedays.
It may not be the most scientific of arguments and roster talent obviously plays a massive part, but a happier head coach has coincided with a more successful team on the field.
Those may only be superficial changes but they are indicative of a fresh start which begins at the very top in Kansas City.
Week 5 on 91Èȱ¬ 5 live sports extra
We have live coverage of the meeting between the Super Bowl champion New Orleans Saints and the Arizona Cardinals on 91Èȱ¬ 5 live sports extra from 2100 BST on Sunday.
While the Saints have not been firing on all cylinders just yet, they can take heart from the fact they are not in as bad a shape as the Cardinals, who are still coming to terms with one of the biggest talent level drop-offs at a single position in NFL history.
Last season, the Cardinals boasted one of the NFL's best passing attacks in the game and were led by future Hall of Famer Kurt Warner. In 2010, they have the league's 30th-ranked passing offense and have yet to settle on their long-term quarterback, even though they have battled to a 2-2 record.
Veteran Derek Anderson has been generally awful and untested rookie Max Hall might not be ready to be thrown to the wolves just yet. Add in the fact that the Cardinals will be missing key receivers in Steve Breaston and Early Doucet through injury and I cannot see how they can keep pace with the Saints this weekend.
Finally, I interviewed 49ers president Jed York in London this week and you can hear our chat on Sunday. He was very upbeat and genuinely feels the 49ers still have all the pieces in place to be a playoff team this season. The Niners may be winless after four weeks but they are still bringing more than 3,000 fans to London so the fans also remain a positive bunch. That is an impressive number but it is not quite their full allocation, which means some of the best seats at Wembley can now be snapped up by British fans via , even at this relatively late hour.
Comment number 1.
At 7th Oct 2010, eddie-george wrote:Uh, Neil, Patriots fan here. I'm guessing you skipped over the roles of Scott Pioli, Charlie Weis and Romeo Crennel in reviving the Chiefs because you're a grumpy Dolphins supporter?!?
The Chiefs do look a decent team this year, but the significant Parcells-Belichick influence in Kansas now means we perhaps should have expected it. Don't see them winning on Sunday however, the Colts are going to be pretty angry themselves after last week's loss, but will be interesting to see if the Chiefs can live with the Chargers for the duration of the season - probably depends on Cassel's form, but he's got the talent.
Wonder what you think about the main Patriots news from this week - I was not hugely shocked that Moss got traded, I felt he was on borrowed time after that Week 1 tirade, but we only got a 3rd round draft pick in return? I though the Vikes were desperate for a receiver, the way it played out looks like we were ready to to get rid of Moss at almost any price.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 1)
Comment number 2.
At 7th Oct 2010, dandlyons wrote:The Chiefs may be undefeated after 3 games but this needs to be looked at in more detail before proclaiming a massive turn around in Kansas City. They have beaten two very poor sides in the 49ers (0-4) and the Browns (1-3) as well as the traditionally slow starting San Diego Chargers. Against the Chargers they rode their luck as the Chargers offense misfired. Matt Cassel only threw 68yards in the game compared to 298yards from Rivers so lets wait until he faces a good side before proclaiming him as being worth $40 million. Prediction: When the playoffs start Kansas City will be nowhere in sight.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 2)
Comment number 3.
At 7th Oct 2010, TheEssexBat wrote:Hi Neil...a frustrated Raiders fan here. One thing that needs mentioning is how another 4 or 5 wins could be good enough for Kansas to make the play-offs. As much as it hurts me to say it with the Silver & Black in there, the AFC West is poor...and has been poor for a good few years. Normally, an 8-8 season has been good enough to get out of the division, but because of the Chargers dropping in class, the Bronco's (despite Orton throwing 400+ each game) unable to stop points being scored and my Raiders inability to stop any sort of run what-so-ever...the Chiefs may only need to win 7 games to get into the play-offs...then anything can happen.
Cassel has stepped up this year, no doubt, he showed what he can do with some weapons in that one year with the Pats when Brady was out, I for one was a little disappointed that the Raiders never looked at him when it was clear as day that JaMarcus 'has a strong arm, but stronger appetite' Russell was just not going to cut it...mind you, its Al Davis after all...he would have been more concerned on getting an injury prone speedster wide receiver to add to the collection.
I think Kansas will go places over the next few years...and I tip them to get into the post-season this year...with ease...then who knows...
Whats your opinion on the Raiders? Its frustrating for me knowing that we do have some quality on the Defence (Seymour, Wimbley and the new boys McClain and Houston) but we just do not know how to stop a RB!! We are not far off being a good football team, are we? Or am I just looking through Silver and Black tinted glasses?
Complain about this comment (Comment number 3)
Comment number 4.
At 7th Oct 2010, packersftw wrote:Eddie-George, to quote Neil: 'For a start, Haley did what he should have done from day one and surrounded himself with trusted veteran coaches in the form of Charlie Weis (offensive coordinator) and Romeo Crennel (defensive coordinator). That pair were vital members of Bill Belichick's backroom staff when the New England Patriots were taking the NFL by storm at the start of the new century.
As well as bringing tremendous technical knowledge to the Chiefs, Weis and Crennel bring head coaching experience at Notre Dame University and the Cleveland Browns respectively and have been able to impart some of their wisdom on the much younger Haley.'
Anyone else remember when the Chiefs went 6-0 in 2003? That didn't end up so well, but I agree that they are the most improved team in the NFL.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 4)
Comment number 5.
At 7th Oct 2010, Cachwr Penffordd wrote:Hi Neil....a Chiefs fan glad that they are currently ahead of sched...... expect to feel the Colts backlash this weekend mind you, but realistically a good performance against the Colts even in defeat and the only tough road games are in Houston and San Diego, as the rest are more than capable of being won. The running game came together last season, but it is the influence of Weis and especially Crennel that shines through so far this season. Last few seasons they've been playing like the CHEFS not the CHIEFS. As I predicted on 606 board at the start of the season,we will win the division - I think but would see that as a good stepping stone. However watch out for next year...
In the meantime, what about a Chiefs game on NFL on five? Eh? We hear enough of the Cowboys, Dolphins, Giants etc....share the love out a bit...!!!
Great coverage as always. Looking forward to the rest of this season. I see Jets, Ravens, Texans & Chiefs as div champs in AFC with Pats & Steelers wild cards and Redskins, Packers, Saints & Seahawks in NFC with Bears and Falcons w/c.
Ravens & Packers in Superbowl....
Complain about this comment (Comment number 5)
Comment number 6.
At 7th Oct 2010, Neil Reynolds wrote:Eddie George... I thought I did give some attention to Charlie Weis and Romeo Crennel? They have certainly taken the pressure off Haley and he has benefited from having wise heads around him. Didn't get into Scott Pioli in this piece but you are right - the Chiefs have drafted very well under his leadership and as he did in New England, he is giving his team talented players on the field.
Dandylyons... I fully accept that we should wait a while before annointing the Chiefs as Super Bowl contenders - I myself remain to be convinced and don't have them as playoff certs just yet. But as TheEssexBat rightly points out, they might only need 8 or 9 wins to take the division. But they do still have a fair bit to prove in the coming weeks. This article is more a reflection of a good start and a change in stance by Haley.
On the Randy Moss trade, letting him go for a 3rd rounder shows the Pats just wanted rid of him. He was obviously becoming a real problem in the locker room and around the team, although we will probably never know. Haven't we heard that before? How sad that when we look back on Moss' career, we'll remember the tantrums, sulks and problems just as much as the spectacular catches. He'll now put in a superhuman effort for the Vikings this season - but it won't last. It never does.
Another factor is that Belichick likes to load up on draft picks and was happy to turn a disgruntled 33-year-old WR in his 13th season into a young stud who can play for him at a committed level for the next 10 years (providing he puts the pick to good use).
Complain about this comment (Comment number 6)
Comment number 7.
At 7th Oct 2010, dave wrote:Great to see the Chiefs doing well.. I think they're the ultimate football romantic's team.. Peyton Manning's Colts will win though as they'll be hungry to get back to winning ways after stumbling to their divisional rivals for the 2nd time this season.. On the Randy Moss move, I don't think we should be surprised or shocked at this move. Belichick has always been one to think about the future.. He has dared to trade the likes of Lawyer Milloy, Rodney Harrison, etc. in the past, players who have gained reputations at the Patriots just so he can play the system he wants to play.. It was a very good deal for the Patriots and Vikings too who badly need a wide receiver that Brett Favre can pass to as they're currently a one man Adrian Peterson show..
Complain about this comment (Comment number 7)
Comment number 8.
At 7th Oct 2010, uk-charger wrote:As a charger fan I feel I have to respond to the comment by essexbat about the Chargers dropping in class.
How can there be a drop in class when you've got the number one ranked offence and the number two ranked defence...?
Yes we lost to the cheif's but that was because of our very poor speical teams who also cost us the game in Settle. If we had a good speical teams outfit we'd be 4-0. I do agree that the cheifs are a much better
team than the last few years but also think there going to struggle if they
take a couple of heavy defeats. I think the colts will have to much for them this weekend and there coming of an early bye weekend so I can see them going down in this game but I also think it will be close.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 8)
Comment number 9.
At 7th Oct 2010, TheEssexBat wrote:Uk Charger – I only say they have dropped in class based on their transactions…releasing LT and trading away a superb corner in Antonio Cromartie will mean a dip in class for any team. Whilst I do not know just how well these guys were playing towards the end of their time in San Diego….the are getting it done for the Jets…especially LT. Even though you say that they are ranked in the top 3 for both offense and defence (and I cannot dispute that)….it needs to be put into a bit of perspective…before the Houston game last week the Raiders were ranked number 3 defence in the league…the Raiders!! Also, you would hope to put points on the board when you play teams like the Jags and Seattle. Philip Rivers through over 450 yards in the Seattle game…and they still got beaten.
I agree with your comment about your special teams costing you but the same could be said for our run defence…we stop half the yards we are leaking and we are the top ranked team in the league! Only Arian Foster and Adrian Peterson have taken games away from us.
Im not saying the Chargers are a bad team, far from it (I fully expect a whoopin’ when we meet at the weekend)…but I can’t see them make a sustained impact…but it is early days.
Watching Ryan Matthews run for 150+ yards and at least 2TD’s against our defence this weekend may help in getting the season going properly and change my mind about the Chargers!
Complain about this comment (Comment number 9)
Comment number 10.
At 7th Oct 2010, eddie-george wrote:Yep, Neil, I'm a subliterate Pats-supporting idiot, sorry that was pretty stupid. Will try better next time.
Moss isn't a model citizen, that goes without saying, but I think when you add up the sulks, tantrums etc, over a 12 year career, he's not as routinely disruptive an influence as someone like T.O. Perhaps his age was an issue as well, although Belichick has been known to get a lot of his guys playing well into their 30s, I just thought Belichick would have driven a hard bargain. A third-round pick would for me have been the bare minimum you could demand for Moss.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 10)
Comment number 11.
At 7th Oct 2010, Neil Reynolds wrote:Eddie George... I'll forgive you, even though you are a Patriots fan !! Age probably was a factor with Moss. But you are also right - Belichick tends to 'win' most trades but I would say the Vikings got a good deal in this one. (Providing the motivated Randy Moss shows up, which I think he will this season).
Complain about this comment (Comment number 11)
Comment number 12.
At 7th Oct 2010, realgolf wrote:Neil,whats with the dimensions of Cassel being given in Metres and Kilograms. Most people in Britain think in Feet for height and Stones and Pounds for Weight. Have you been instructed to do this or is this your own decision?
Complain about this comment (Comment number 12)
Comment number 13.
At 7th Oct 2010, CFCYank wrote:'Give the Colts a run for their money'? Then why are they more than a touchdown underdog in the spread? The Bears were 3-0 but showed their true colors against a mediocre NY Giants team allowing 9 sacks in the 1st half last week, having their hats handed to them. A lot of NFL teams don't show their true colors until weeks 10-12.
Otherwise, applying the same logic to the Premier League, I suppose we can safely assume West Brom, who are even on points with Arsenal, will eventually make up that goal differential and have a Champions League spot locked up for next year with Liverpool getting the drop as well? Please...
The Chiefs play in arguably (aside from the NFC West) the weakest division in the NFL and have beaten teams with a combined record thus far of 3-9. I had to check the url to make sure I wasn't on the Mirror when I saw the article's headline. Giving credit where it's due is one thing, but save the sensationalist teasers for the tabloids and the bin.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 13)
Comment number 14.
At 7th Oct 2010, Graeme Swanns Cat wrote:Indianapolis will be the first big test as to whether the Chiefs are a legitimate threat in a season where nobody has really come sprinting out the blocks, and laid down a marker or the 2010 edition of last years Broncos who started 6-0 and proceeded to end the year 2-8.
Looking at the Chiefs schedule 10 wins looks achieveable, but you can't shake the feelings that the Chargers will shake off another early season hangover and storm to the AFC West crown again.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 14)
Comment number 15.
At 7th Oct 2010, Pusa wrote:Sorry to be that guy but the Chiefs are not Kansans. They are from Kansas City, Missouri which is the central city of a bi-state metropolitan area. But still, pretty cool to be a local reading about the Chiefs on 91Èȱ¬. Their schedule isn't the strongest though I think they have a good chance to make the playoffs but due to the AFC's weakness.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 15)
Comment number 16.
At 7th Oct 2010, Graham wrote:Great blog. I think we should watch out for The Chicago Bears, the only weak spot in the team (I suppose its a huge weak spot) is the quarterback, if they could get a decent QB they would be my personal favs for the Super Bowl this season. I do believe its very open this year.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 16)
Comment number 17.
At 7th Oct 2010, MNGuy wrote:I think it says a lot that the Chiefs are the only undefeated team in the NFL so far, all of the other teams are struggling or misfiring or just not clicking as they should. And yes, I agree that it is more of a marathon than a sprint and we won't see the true colours (colors) until the end of the regular season.
Schedules also mean a lot - last year, the Vikes had a relatively easy opening schedule and did well. This year, they've come up against relatively tougher opponents and have not done quite so well. We hope that as the season progresses (and the toughness of the schedule evens out), their record should improve :-)
The arrival of Moss back here in MN has been very well received, there are high expectations of #84 and all of the past incidents seem to have been forgiven if not forgotten. Or at least will be if he lives up to his previous playing/scoring standards.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 17)
Comment number 18.
At 7th Oct 2010, plushpuppy8 wrote:Yes the Chiefs have improved but it´s early days yet. The Texans and the Patriots are also on the up and up. Personally I haven´t seem a team that has been totally convincing yet, looks like being a tight season, maybe time for a surprise in the Super Bowl? Oh and in reply to "Graham" another weak spot for the Bears, possibly the O-line that allowed 9 sacks in the first 2 quarters against the Giants last week ?
Complain about this comment (Comment number 18)
Comment number 19.
At 8th Oct 2010, crash wrote:If they do build a patriots style foundation,it will be scary for the AFC for a few years !
Complain about this comment (Comment number 19)
Comment number 20.
At 8th Oct 2010, RobF wrote:Chiefs fan here. Thank you for the cool little piece on the team, I think irrespective of the media love so far this season, we have definitely over achieved and there are some reasons to believe we'll come crashing down to earth again soon, potentially in Indy.
Cassel has not been anything like the top 3 QB his salary would suggest he would be and in all three wins has picked up where he left off last season, routinely overthrowing WR's or failing to spot the open man. For his size he does not throw the long ball well.
The good news is the one-two rushing attack, and in particular Jamaal Charles, who most NFL fans are still sleeping on, he picked up 1000 yards playing just half a season last year and tears up 7 or 8 yards per carry with home run threat every time - best YPC in the league.
If Chiefs can sustain this form then it's the young defense who look most like becoming a legitimate league-leading unit, six years of first round picks in so many positions (Jackson and Dorsey in the front three, Hali and Derrick Johnson at LB and Berry in the Secondary with Flowers, a shoe in already for the Pro Bowl, who always should have been a first rounder)
Whatever happens I'll just enjoy it while it lasts - and I have tickets to go see the next two consecutive home games against the Bills and the Jaguars - just the 3 connecting flights from Bristol via Amsterdam and Minnesota!
Complain about this comment (Comment number 20)
Comment number 21.
At 8th Oct 2010, Neil Reynolds wrote:RealGolf... I very much still work in feet and inches and pounds, particularly when talking about NFL players. This must have been edited by one of those young pups who operates in kilos and metres these days!
Pusa... I didn't realise I had use the term Kansans... that would be the first time in my life ! I'm going to blame a typo. Or I could always throw another one of the sub-editors under the bus !
Complain about this comment (Comment number 21)
Comment number 22.
At 8th Oct 2010, Robbo wrote:Neil,
A perceptive blog, as usual. The fact that the Chiefs are the only unbeaten team at this early stage points to an interesting season ahead.
I'm glad you answered Realgolf's point about the metric descriptors as I was thinking exactly the same myself and expected the answer you gave. If it was a young editor then perhaps s/he should realise that your blog is most likely to be of interest in the UK, obviously, and the US both of which use the imperial system. Or is the 91Èȱ¬ still pushing its pro Euro agenda so prevalent throughout the site? Hasn't anyone realised that there's been a change of Government?!
That said, keep up the good work.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 22)