91热爆

Attitudes to punishment - EduqasRetribution and deterrence in the 16th and 17th centuries

Attitudes towards punishments have changed over time. Methods of punishment that were deemed acceptable in the past are now considered cruel or harsh. Why have attitudes to punishment changed over time?

Part of HistoryChanges in crime and punishment in Britain, c.500 to the present day

Retribution and deterrence in the 16th and 17th centuries

In the face of a rising crime rate, attitudes to punishment in the 16th and 17th centuries were very harsh. Punishments were intended to make the criminal suffer and also discourage others from committing crimes by making them want to avoid similar punishments themselves.

Retribution

Retribution means to give an equivalent or returned punishment for a crime. It suggests a victim taking for a crime by making the criminal suffer. The desire for retribution was a key purpose of punishment until the early 19th century.

This was a key attitude behind capital punishment (punishment by death) and corporal punishment (punishment using pain) from the 16th to the 19th centuries. There were different punishments for different types of crime. All punishments gave retribution as criminals were made to suffer pain, humiliation and often death for their crimes.

Deterrence

Deterrence means to discourage someone from committing a crime by making them afraid of the consequences. This is usually done by making the punishment harsh and unpleasant.

Punishment

The methods of capital and corporal punishment used during the Tudor and Stuart periods demonstrate the desire to make punishment particularly brutal. Punishments were intended to both act as deterrents and deliver retribution

Capital punishment

Serious crimes in Tudor and Stuart times resulted in capital punishment. The most common method of execution was by hanging. Other methods of execution included burning at the stake, which was the punishment for

Illustration showing a crowd gathered around two men being burned at the stake.
Image caption,
Protestant Bishops Hugh Latimer and Nicholas Ridley were burned at the stake in Oxford during the reign of Mary I

Corporal punishment

An illustration of a man in a pillory which has been splattered with vegtables
Figure caption,
A man in a pillory

Several methods of were also used in the 16th and 17th centuries. The and were commonly used to humiliate and inflict pain on criminals. was also used. Earlier in the period, and were commonly used. Punishments like these were designed to be visible to the whole community. This made them more humiliating for the criminal but also made them a more effective deterrent, as others knew what they would face if they committed the same crime.

Women who were said to scold or argue with their husbands were often punished with a in a local river or pond. They might also be led around the town wearing a scold鈥檚 bridle - a heavy iron cage for the head with a piece of iron to go into the mouth and sit on the tongue. The fact that women experienced these punishments reflected the attitudes towards women and their status in the early modern period.