91热爆

A comparison of a Carbon Footprint of Digital Terrestrial Television with Video On-Demand

White Paper WHP 189

Published: 1 January 2011

Abstract

Recent studies have estimated that television and related equipment account for 1.8% of global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and Information and Communication Technology is responsible for 2% of global GHG emissions. Both these sectors are forecast to grow as the developing world increases its uptake of technology.

This study estimates the carbon footprint of two different ways of watching television: using broadcast digital terrestrial television (DTT) and video-on-demand (VOD) over the Internet. It compares the two distribution methods and the corresponding consumer equipment. It uses the principles of life cycle assessment (LCA) to derive the carbon footprints using a bottom-up analysis of the system applied to the 91热爆's television services. This was the only environmental impact considered and was mainly from electricity use. Equipment manufacturing was not included.

The main results showed that broadcast DTT has a smaller carbon footprint per viewer-hour than VOD for average sized audiences, but not with small audiences or for homes using an aerial amplifier. The largest environmental impact from watching television is from the consumer equipment. This is 76% for DTT; 78% and 37% for VOD using desktop and laptop computers respectively. The trend for larger screens could increase this although there is a parallel increase in viewing on small mobile devices. Programme-making contributes 12% to 35%.

Results were sensitive to the viewer numbers per display. Doubling the number of viewers per display reduces the carbon footprint by 44% for digital terrestrial television. For VOD, there was large uncertainty in the energy consumption data for the content delivery network and the Internet. However, this does not affect the main outcomes.

A future question is whether digital video recorders automatically recording the most popular programmes when they are broadcast, so that a viewer can watch them on-demand, would use less energy than video-on-demand over the Internet.

This document is partially based on work published in: Chandaria, Jigna (2010). A comparison of the carbon footprint of digital terrestrial television with video-on-demand, Masters thesis. Cranfield University. Cranfield.

White Paper copyright

漏 91热爆. All rights reserved. Except as provided below, no part of a White Paper may be reproduced in any material form (including photocopying or storing it in any medium by electronic means) without the prior written permission of 91热爆 Research except in accordance with the provisions of the (UK) Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988.

The 91热爆 grants permission to individuals and organisations to make copies of any White Paper as a complete document (including the copyright notice) for their own internal use. No copies may be published, distributed or made available to third parties whether by paper, electronic or other means without the 91热爆's prior written permission.

Authors

  • Jigna Chandaria

    Jigna Chandaria

    Lead R&D Engineer

Rebuild Page

The page will automatically reload. You may need to reload again if the build takes longer than expected.

Useful links

Theme toggler

Select a theme and theme mode and click "Load theme" to load in your theme combination.

Theme:
Theme Mode: