Main content

Maguire Seven鈥檚 convictions quashed

The Maguire Seven have won an appeal against their conviction (on 4 March 1976) for making the explosives used in the Guildford and Woolwich pub bombs.

Joshua Rozenberg鈥檚 report begins with archive footage of the aftermath of the Guildford pub bombs (on 5 October 1974).

Using old photographs as illustration, Rozenberg goes on to explain the relationships between Anne Maguire, her husband Paddy (Patrick), Paddy鈥檚 brother-in-law Giuseppe Conlon and Giuseppe鈥檚 son Gerry. It was Gerry Conlon (of the Guildford Four) who allegedly told police that Anne Maguire, his aunt, was the person who had shown him how to make bombs; this was why the police went to their house in the first place. It was also alleged by police that Paul Hill (another member of the Guildford Four) also identified Mrs. Maguire.

Anne Maguire and her husband are willing to forgive the two men. Anne Maguire states, 鈥淭he damage is done, but I don鈥檛 hate them for it. In fact I have prayed for them, all during my sentence".

Patrick Maguire states, 鈥淚 don鈥檛 pray for them. If I never see them in this world or the next world I couldn鈥檛 care less. I forgive them.鈥

Rozenberg reminds us that the Maguires鈥 convictions rested almost entirely on tests carried out by forensic scientists.

When the Guildford Four were released in 1989, retired judge Sir John May was appointed to investigate their case and that of the Maguires鈥. Tests commissioned by Sir John showed that forensic samples used to convict the Maguire family may have been innocently contaminated because they had touched objects already contaminated by nitro-glycerine. Last summer he declared the Maguires鈥 convictions unsound.

It was on this issue of 鈥榠nnocent contamination鈥 that the Crown today conceded the convictions were no longer safe.

CONTEXT
On 5 October 1974 the Provisional Irish Republican Army (PIRA) targeted Guildford, Surrey, because it was situated close to a number of garrison towns. The PIRA planted two six-pound gelignite bombs in two pubs. The first exploded just before 9.00pm in the Horse and Groom, destroying the front of the building and shattering the windows of neighbouring shops.

It killed Paul Craig, a plasterer (22 years old); two members of the Scots Guards, William Forsyth (18) and John Hunter (17); and two members of the Women鈥檚 Royal Army Corps, Caroline Jean Slater (18) and Ann Ray Hamilton (19). A further sixty-five persons were wounded.

After the first explosion, other public houses were evacuated, including the Seven Stars where the second bomb exploded at approximately 9.35 p.m. without causing any serious injuries.

On November 7 1974 Gunner Richard Dunne, a soldier (42) and Alan Horsley, a sales clerk (20) were killed when a PIRA bomb exploded in the King鈥檚 Arms in Woolwich. Twenty-six people, including five soldiers, were injured.

In December 1974 the police arrested three men and a woman: Gerry Conlon, Paul Hill, Patrick Armstrong and Carole Richardson. In October 1975 these four were convicted of the Guildford and Woolwich bombings and given life sentences. The group was known as the Guildford Four.

On 4 March 1976 the Maguire Seven were convicted of making the explosives used in these bombings. The Maguire Seven were: - Anne Maguire, Patrick Maguire (Anne鈥檚 husband), Patrick Maguire (son of Anne and Patrick), Vincent Maguire (son of Anne and Patrick), Sean Smyth (brother of Anne), Patrick O鈥橬eill (family friend) and Giuseppe Conlon (brother-in-law of Anne Maguire and father of Gerry Conlon).
Over the years, the cases of the Guildford Four and the Maguire Seven came under increasing legal scrutiny and the range of those seeking a review of the convictions extended widely. On 17 October 1989 it was announced that corruption proceedings would be taken against the police involved in the conviction of the Guildford Four. Two days later, with the exception of Paul Hill, those convicted for the bombings were released. This followed an announcement by the Director of Public Prosecutions that it would be wrong for the Crown 鈥榯o seek to sustain鈥 the convictions of 1975 on the basis of confessions that they had later retracted. The Court of Appeal had decided that the DPP in 1975 had suppressed scientific evidence which conflicted with the confessions. Paul Hill remained in custody because he was implicated in a case that had not yet been resolved. His conviction was eventually quashed in April 1994.

On 26 June 1991 the Court of Appeal overturned the sentences on the Maguire Seven. All of them had completed their sentences. Afterwards many criticised the court for dismissing most of the grounds of appeal and had simply concluded that the hands of the convicted could have been innocently contaminated with nitro-glycerine.

Release date:

Duration:

2 minutes