Assault on Justice
Shelley Jofre investigates whether punishing violent crimes with cautions and fines is letting some serious criminals off the hook and denying justice to victims.
A man given a beating in his own home. A young woman bitten and punched by a man. A bottle smashed onto the head of an innocent bystander in an argument. Three victims, all violently assaulted - yet their attackers escaped prosecution, receiving cautions instead.
Half of all criminal cases brought to justice in England and Wales are now dealt with out of court. It's fast justice...but is it fair?
The government says out-of-court punishments, like cautions and fines, are helping to unclog the overburdened courts system and deal swiftly with antisocial behaviour. Critics say it is simply justice on the cheap, letting some serious criminals off the hook and, crucially, denying victims their day in court.
Shelley Jofre investigates whether these decisions, made behind closed doors instead of in open court, are tough on crime or the causes of crime.
Last on
More episodes
Previous
Credits
Role | Contributor |
---|---|
Presenter | Jeremy Vine |
Participant | Shelley Jofre |
Executive Producer | Marcus Ryder |
Producer | Katy Stead |
Explore the wider challenges that people with a learning disability face in society, and how this impacts on their health
Find out more with The Open University.