Writer Jonathan Coe
What inspired you to write The Rotters' Club?
I had always wanted to write a novel set in a school, using it - with
all its power struggles, cliques and rivalries - as a microcosm for
society as a whole. Very much in the way that Lindsay Anderson did in
his brilliant film If.
Also, I wanted to write a book which presented a version of the Seventies
as I remembered them: away from the comfortably nostalgic, retro, kitsch,
glam-rock-and-spacehoppers version that television always seemed to
offer us.
There was more to the Seventies, I thought, than just Blue Peter and
flared loons - although of course the temptation to have a bit of fun
with all that was irresistible as well.
How autobiographical is The Rotters' Club?
All the background detail is autobiographical: the world the Trotter
family inhabits is not far from my own family background, and the school
in the novel, King William's, is clearly based on my own school, King
Edward's in Edgbaston.
I also kept in one or two incidents that I'd recorded in my teenage
diaries - like a time I had lost my school bag, and I prayed to have
it returned, and found it a few seconds later, which I interpreted as
a miracle and which turned me into a bit of a religious freak for a
few months afterwards.
But all the major storylines are fictional. I had no direct contact
with the Birmingham pub bombings, for instance, or the industrial disputes
at British Leyland.
Still, it seemed important to get these important bits of local history
in somehow.
How did Dick Clement and Ian La Frenais end up as the writers
of the adaptation?
It was my idea, I seem to remember, to ask Dick and Ian to adapt it
- with, I have to say, absolutely no expectation that they would agree.
They were my idols in the Seventies. I was fanatical about Porridge
and particularly Whatever Happened To The Likely Lads?
In those days you couldn't video your favourite shows and the only
alternative was to buy these terrible 'novelisations' of the TV series,
which the 91热爆 used to publish.
So at a time when my fellow novelists-in-waiting were all probably
reading Henry James and Proust, I was learning these sitcom scripts
more or less off by heart.
I can't think of any writers, either for stage or screen, who do better
comic dialogue than Dick and Ian, and the rhythms of the dialogue in
my novel were taken directly from The Likely Lads anyway, so it's perfect
(and rather unbelievable, to me) that they have ended up adapting it.
A real closing of the circle, if you like.
(On a minor point, the male protagonists of an early novel of mine,
The House of Sleep, are called Robert and Terry in homage to The Likely
Lads. No critic has ever noticed this however - probably because they
were all too busy reading Henry James and Proust in the Seventies as
well.)
The adaptation has quite an exciting cast. What is it like
to see your characters in the flesh?
I'm delighted with the casting and bowled over by the performances.
It's impossible to single anyone out, although I am hugely impressed
by the way the younger members of the cast hold their own in such starry
company.
At the same time, it's a strange experience because I hardly ever
describe my characters visually, or have a strong sense in my head of
what they look like - whereas now, of course, whenever I pick up the
book again I can only see Geoff Breton as Benjamin, Kevin Doyle as his
father and so on.
So they have taken over my characters, in a way. Which is fine, as
far as I'm concerned.
What was it like being on set watching the filming?
Very relaxing, for me, because I had no role to play - my work was
finished a long time ago and I was just there as a spectator.
On the other hand I think it makes actors very tense to have one of
the writers around - I can see why they're often banned from the set!
It can be inhibiting for the performers, I suppose, because they're
suddenly confronted by this guy whose brain gave birth to the character
they're meant to be playing, and they get nervous that they might not
be faithful to his vision.
I wasn't there to check up at all. I was purely there out of nosiness,
because I've always been fascinated by the filmmaking process and all
of a sudden I had an excuse to go and observe it at close quarters.
When you write do you visualise how it may convert to screen?
No, not at all. You'd end up writing a very pale and feeble imitation
of a novel if you did that.
I write for the printed page, for the individual reader sitting in
an armchair somewhere - at the back of my mind, I always imagine a kind
of private dialogue between this ideal reader and me.
Did the screen adaptation of The Rotters' Club affect the content
of the sequel (The Closed Circle) in any way?
With almost perfect timing, I got the call from Company Pictures telling
me that the project had been green-lit about two days after finishing
The Closed Circle.
Until then it had only been in development, and that can be such a
long and frustrating process that you have to try to forget that it's
even going on at all - because of course 90% of projects in development
never get made.
In any case most of The Closed Circle was planned at the same time
as The Rotters' Club, in the late Nineties.
It was always my intention that the two books should go together -
they're inseparable, in fact, because after you've finished The Closed
Circle, you realise that several things about the story in The Rotters'
Club were not as you believed them to be. The second book re-writes
the first one, if you like.
This was a bit tough on Dick and Ian, because they were slightly in
the dark about some of the plot developments in The Closed Circle, which
I wanted to keep close to my chest. But in the end, of course, I had
to let them in on the secrets.
For me, watching the TV adaptation now, the main point relating to
The Closed Circle is that it makes Sebastian Harding's performance as
little Paul Trotter seem so poignant - because he portrays him as this
freakish but somehow quite loveable little monster, whereas after you've
read the second book, you realise what a nasty bastard he grows up to
be!