91Èȱ¬ > Opinion > Climate change and disability: a burning issue
Tom Shakespeare
Tom is a Research Fellow at Newcastle University. His non-fiction books include Genetics Politics: from Eugenics to Genome and The Sexual Politics of Disability.
Climate change and disability: a burning issue
23rd October 2009
Following up their piece, I came across the Human Impact Report on "Climate Change - The Anatomy of a Silent Crisis", published by the here in Geneva. It is as alarming as it is glossy, showing that while 235 million people are currently directly affected by climate change, this will rise to 660 million by 2030.
From the projections in the report, it seems that many factors will cause problems for disabled people in particular.
Drought and famine will have a big impact. Already, 1.3 billion people in the world suffer water scarcity. Global warming is projected to cause a 50% reduction in food yield by 2020. Already, drought reduced food yield in Uganda by 30% in some areas in 2008. Currently, 40% of child deaths in Uganda are caused by malnutrition, and 38% of children under 5 are stunted because of lack of food.
A third example is the increase in climate-related disasters, such as hurricanes and flooding. According to the insurer Munich Re, there has been a 40% increase in weather related disasters since 1980. There are currently 400 weather related disasters per year.
It is well known that disabled and older people are more vulnerable in emergencies. For example, 60% of the deaths caused by Hurricane Katrina were in people aged 65 or older. By 2030, 350 million people worldwide will be affected by natural disasters. More awareness is needed of the particular needs of disabled people in emergencies.
Finally, the problems of food and water scarcity, plus natural disasters, plus rise in sea level, will generate more displaced people. Already, there are 26 million climate- displaced people in the world, and each year, another 1m are displaced due to climate related disasters. These figures are projected to triple by 2030, with low lying islands and countries like Bangladesh particularly vulnerable.
To summarise, the message from these projections seems to be that because of global warming, more people might become disabled; more disabled people are likely to become sick or die; and that disabled people will be more affected by factors such as famine, weather disaster and consequent migration. The obvious conclusion is that climate change is a disability rights issue.
Faced by the reality documented in this and other global reports on global warming, my individual decisions to use the train rather than fly, or use my manual chair rather than the power chair, can only be trivial acts of conscience. But perhaps together, when the millions of disabled people in the world add their voices to the campaign for climate action, we can help make a difference.
More articles about
Bookmark with...
Live community panel
Listen to our regular razor sharp talk show online, or subscribe to it as a podcast. Spread the word: it's where disability and reality almost collide.
More from the 91Èȱ¬
All the latest news from the paralympics.
News and views for people who are blind or partially sighted.
Weekdays 12.40pm. Radio 4's consumer affairs programme.
Comments
You seem to have forgotten another aspect that affects us on the home front - many of the measures aimed at getting people to live "greener" lives have a negative impact on us, including dumping extra recycling boxes on us, and not building Disabled people into plans for easing traffic. It's all well and good trsvelling by bus instead of car....providing you can get a bus.
Complain about this comment
Hardline eco-zealots on a climate change bandwaggon routinely ignore the needs of disabled people
e.g. "cars are evil, so we must pedestrianise" But some people physically need cars. Or "light bulbs are evil, so everyone must use a 'sanctified' type of bulb" But some people's sight or brain response demands different bulbs.
The worst impact on climate change is relentless churning out of babies. But the populist climate-change bandwaggon chooses to ignore that.
Complain about this comment
Most of the article left me unmoved primarily because until we can have an adult and non-hysterical examination of the whole GW 'religion', it's totally wasted because it represents nothing more than a wholly unprovable theory. Even the 'scientists' admit they can't actually get their computer 'modelling' to fit their gloomy scenario.
People like David Bellamy have effectively been gagged by the media, simply because his own deliberations are at odds with the 'official, soak the taxpayer for more dosh and frighten them silly into the bargain' advocates.
Have we all taken collective leave of our commonsenses, and ignored the fact that our planet undergoes periodic climatic changes, completely irrespective of the fleabite which man represents ?
Complain about this comment
Well I'm all for helping a bit, but when Western Governments are blowing the Hell out of countries with high explosives and the Israelis are blasting phosphorous bombs over Palestine as the Eastern Governments go into overdrive on industrialisation; me, staying in so I don't use too much power on me wheels, seems a wee bit futile.
But, then if I'd ever had a jet -setting lifestyle things might seem a tad different. So until my recycling centre has a facility for washing the muck off my tyres so I don't have to rewash the carpet with stain remover every-time I return home - class me as somewhat sceptical.
Complain about this comment
The European Union is using the idea of durability - looking at ecology, equality and economy together.
An inclusive world is also logically a sustainable world. Disability Essex has done a brilliant job here.
Complain about this comment
If we are to use green enagy to keep warm + that is more expensive to produce will we get extra benifts to use carbon free fuels as we sit shivering over a little 2 bar heater or will we get Ba humbug from the chancoler
Complain about this comment
Well said broadgrin. The biggest problem is too many people. It is now sometimes said out loud that the next wars will be fought over water, not oil. If population growth could be reversed worldwide, the Earth would have a chance of sustaining us all at a reasonable level of comfort.
Complain about this comment
This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the .
View these comments in RSS