Ask Bearders # 168
Welcome to Ask Bearders, where Test Match Special statistician answers your questions on all things cricket.
Below are Bill's responses to some of your questions posed at the end of his last column and if you have a question for Bill, leave it at the end of this blog entry. Please do include your country of residence - Bill loves to hear where all his correspondents are posting from.
Bill isn't able to answer all of your questions, however. 91热爆 Sport staff will choose a selection of them and send them to Bearders for him to answer.
Q. Ryan Sidebottom took a but finished on the losing side. Has this happened previously in Tests? Mark Bailey
Bearders' Answer: Ten of the 37 Test match hat-tricks have been achieved by bowlers who finished on the losing side. The full list is:
J.Briggs - England v Australia, Sydney, 1891-92
G.M.Griffin - South Africa v England, Lord's, 1960
P.J.Petherick - New Zealand v Pakistan, Lahore, 1976-77
M.G.Hughes - Australia v West Indies, Perth, 1988-89
D.Gough - England v Australia, Sydney, 1998-99
Mohammad Sami - Pakistan v Sri Lanka, Lahore, 2001-02
J.J.C.Lawson - West Indies v Australia, Bridgetown, 2002-03
Alok Kapali - Bangladesh v Pakistan, Peshawar, 2003
I.K.Pathan - India v Pakistan, Karachi, 2005-06
R.J.Sidebottom - England v New Zealand, Hamilton, 2007-08
Q. What is the least number of bowlers used in a completed Test match? Ian S, UK
Bearders' Answer: The fewest I can find is six, three by each side in the Old Trafford Ashes Test of 1888, when England (172) beat Australia (81 and 70) by an innings and 21 runs. The six bowlers were R.Peel, G.A.Lohmann and J.Briggs (England), and J.J.Ferris, C.T.B.Turner and S.M.J.Woods (Australia).
Q. When there is a run out and both batsmen are stranded at one end of the wicket (and assuming they are level with each other relative to the wicket), are they allowed to decide between themselves who will sacrifice himself? Lilia Aird
Bearders' Answer: No, the umpires must decide according to Law 38 (Run Out), (3 - Which Batsman is Out?).
It would depend on which wicket was broken and the decision would vary according to the number of runs taken. For example, if just one run was attempted by the striker, without the non-striker leaving his crease, and the wicket was broken at the non-striker's (bowler's) end with both batsmen in the crease, then the striker would be out.
There was a fluke instance in a limited-overs international between England and West Indies at Scarborough when a return from the boundary broke both wickets (through a ricochet from one set of stumps to the other) while both batsmen were stranded in mid-wicket. After much discussion the confused umpires gave neither batsman out!
Q. Who scored the most runs in Test cricket in a calendar year? Mark, USA
Bearders' Answer: holds that record with 1,788 runs, average 99.33, including nine centuries in 19 innings for Pakistan in 2006.
Q. In terms of stats, when is a batsman deemed to have actually batted? When a ball is bowled whilst he is in the middle or when he faces any ball? In the recent Wellington Test, did Chris Martin technically "bat" in the final innings? He faced nothing at all, but he was there in the middle for at least 30 seconds while the match was in progress.
Chris, Birmingham
Bearders' Answer: Law 10 (Commencement of a Batsman's Innings) decrees that, except at the start of play, a batsman's innings begins when he first steps on to the field of play, provided 'Time' has not been called. The innings of opening batsmen, and that of any new batsman at the resumption of play after a call of 'Time', shall commence at the call of 'Play'.
Q. Paul Harris of South Africa has just returned figures of 3 for 203 in the First Test against India. In Test cricket what are the most runs conceded by a bowler in an innings, the most in a match, and most in an innings without taking a wicket? John K
Bearders' Answer: Paul Harris's analysis is the 19th most expensive in a Test innings, the record being 1 for 298 by leg-break and googly bowler for Australia v England at The Oval in August 1938.
Fast bowler Khan Mohammad's 0 for 259 for Pakistan v West Indies at Kingston in February/March 1958 is the most expensive wicketless innings analysis.
Leg-spinner Oscar Charles Scott (9 for 374 for West Indies v England at Kingston in April 1930) returned the most expensive Test match analysis, with innings figures of 5 for 266 and 4 for 108.
Q. A bowler can concede four wides or no-balls if the ball goes over the boundary - so could six wides or no-balls be conceded if a particularly wild ball went over the boundary without touching the ground? John Walter
Bearders' Answer: No. Six runs are awarded only for HITS over the boundary. Law 19 (Boundaries) (4) confirms that the ball must be struck by the bat to qualify for six runs. It is not possible to get a boundary six from a wide, leg-bye or bye, even though the ball has reached the boundary full pitch from such a delivery.
Q. When Ryan Sidebottom and Stuart Broad were batting together in the recent Napier Test, was this the first ever instance of two sons of former Test players batting together at the same time for England? Michael Green, Gravesend
Bearders' Answer: As 12 sets of fathers and sons have now represented England, that certainly wasn't the first time that two of the sons have batted together. The most obvious recent example is Alec Stewart and Mark Butcher (sons of Michael and Alan respectively). They opened together on three occasions: against Australia at Sydney in 1998-99 and in both innings against New Zealand at Lord's in 1999.
Q. What rules (if any) govern the eligibility of substitute fielders? Does one have to qualify to play for the nation in question in order to take to the field in Tests or internationals to qualify? Andrew Murray
Bearders' Answer: Law 2 governs the use of substitute fielders. It confirms that the fielding captain can call upon ANYONE he likes to undertake that role, and that they can field wherever he directs, apart from acting as wicket-keeper. Once the umpires have granted the use of a substitute fielder, the batting captain cannot object either to who he is or where he fields.
Q. During my childhood my grandad spoke about cricket a lot, giving stories and telling tales, and it was only towards the end of his years I found out he played for Lancashire but I am unsure whether he played for England. His name was Edward Kelly. Can you help? Jamie Wilson, England
Bearders' Answer: was a right-handed batsman and right-arm bowler (style unknown) who played in four first-class matches for Lancashire (against Scotland, Cambridge University, Glamorgan and Derbyshire) in May and June 1957.
He scored 38 runs at 9.50 with a highest score of 16 not out, and took four wickets at 62.00 with a best analysis of 3 for 77. He also appeared in 11 Minor Counties Championship matches for Lancashire Second XI in 1956 and 1957.
Born at Bootle on 26 November 1932, he died at Leyland on 7 October 1998.
Q. Name some cricketers whose career average is higher than their individual highest score in Test matches. Santonu Borpuzari
Bearders' Answer: Given a qualification of 10 innings, there are just two players whose batting averages exceeded their highest score. Pakistan's Antao D'Souza (10 inns, 8 not outs, 76 runs, average 38.00), had a highest score of 23 not out. India's S.G.Shinde (11 inns, 5 not outs, 85 runs, average 14.17), just qualified with a highest score of 14.
Q. Is it possible to take 10 wickets in a six-ball over? If you get at least five run outs, plus 5 stumped off wides, is this legally possible? Paul Rosser
Bearders' Answer: In theory, there is no limit to the number of wickets that could fall off a . In addition to six wickets from orthodox dismissals, as neither wides nor no-balls count in an over, you could have limitless stumpings off the former and run outs off the latter.
Comment number 1.
At 21st Apr 2008, Lozza wrote:Hi Bill.
how many all rounders have had a higher batting average than bowling, also what is the best example of this? the widest difference between a players batting average and his bowling.
cheers
Laurie
Complain about this comment (Comment number 1)
Comment number 2.
At 21st Apr 2008, alcrisp wrote:Bill,
I noticed in this year's Wisden that, playing for Barisal against Sylhet in Bangladesh last year, Ariful Haque put on 238 with Raqibul Hasan for the 7th wicket. What caught my eye was the fact that Ariful was only 14 years and 123 days old. Is he the youngest first class centurion, and if not, who is?
Thanks...
Complain about this comment (Comment number 2)
Comment number 3.
At 21st Apr 2008, lout_from_the_lane wrote:Bill
Much has been said about England's preparations (or lack of) for away test series.
When was the last time we won the first test in an away series?
In the last 10 years what are England's away records for the first, second, third and later tests? Does excluding the likes of Zimbabwe and Bangledesh disort the above?
Complain about this comment (Comment number 3)
Comment number 4.
At 21st Apr 2008, bruce_a_r wrote:Hi Bill,
I remember reading a report of a women's
match featuring South Africa and Bermuda, whereby South Africa required only 4 balls to chase down the total posted by Bermuda. In all limited overs cricket, what's the quickest run-chase, in terms of number of balls delivered.
Thanks,
Bruce (Cambridge, UK)
Complain about this comment (Comment number 4)
Comment number 5.
At 21st Apr 2008, snoopthebonedoc wrote:Hello Bill
If the highest test score is 400 n.o. what is the lowest score yet to be achieved in a test? How many never achieved scores are there between it and 400.
Neil
England
Complain about this comment (Comment number 5)
Comment number 6.
At 21st Apr 2008, IanPulsford wrote:I have to take issue with Bill here..... (but it's undoubtedly just a typo)
Bearders' Answer: No, the umpires must decide according to Law 38 (Run Out), (3 - Which Batsman is Out?).
It would depend on which wicket was broken and the decision would vary according to the number of runs taken. For example, if just one run was attempted by the striker, without the non-striker leaving his crease, and the wicket was broken at the non-striker's (bowler's) end with both batsmen in the crease, then the striker would be out.
If both batsmen are in the crease at the bowler's (non-striker's) end when that wicket is broken then nobody is run out. The fielding side would need to get the ball to the striker's end to effect a run out.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 6)
Comment number 7.
At 21st Apr 2008, bigbenny123 wrote:Hi.
My teammate recently took 37 balls to get off the mark. What is the record held for most balls faced to get off the mark by a batsman in test cricket?
Also, what is the most balls faced before a duck (once again in Test Cricket)
Complain about this comment (Comment number 7)
Comment number 8.
At 21st Apr 2008, ChileNoseJam wrote:1. fattmann999 - taking 1000 runs and 100 wickets as the cut-off for qualification as an all-rounder, 16 have a higher batting average than bowling (out of a total of 51 who have achieved the double): Monty Noble (batting 30.25, bowling 25.00), Wilfred Rhodes (30.19, 26.96), Keith Miller (36.97, 22.97), Trevor Bailey (29.74, 29.21), Alan Davidson (24.59, 20.53), Garry Sobers (57.78, 34.03), Trevor Goddard (34.46, 26.22), Imran Khan (37.69, 22.81), Tony Greig (40.43, 32.20), Richard Hadlee (27.16, 22.29), Ian Botham (33.54, 28.40), Kapil Dev (31.05, 29.64), Chris Cairns (33.53, 29.40), Shaun Pollock (32.31, 23.11), Jacques Kallis (57.14, 31.30) and Andrew Flintoff (32.50, 32.02); the biggest difference belongs to Kallis, with 25.84. The biggest difference in the other direction, incidentally, is the 22.19 of Mohammad Rafique (batting average 18.57, bowling 40.76).
2. alcrisp - don't know. I've had a look at various others who started their careers at a young age - Mushtaq Mohammad, Javed Miandad, Sachin Tendulkar, Hasan Raza - but can't find any record of when they made their maiden centuries.
3. lout_from_the_lane - the last time England won the first Test of an away series was against South Africa in 2004-05; their record since then is one draw and four losses. Their overall record since 1998-99 is played 16, won 4, drawn 4, lost 8 in the first match of an away series; P16, W4, D8, L4 in the second; P15, W5, D3, L7 in the third; P6, W2, D1, L3 in the fourth; P5, W2, D1, L2 in the fifth (P58, W17, D17, L24 in total). Excluding the minnows makes very little difference as England have only played one series in Bangladesh in that period (P2 W2), and none in Zimbabwe.
4. bruce_a_r - it's supposedly zero balls - the story is that one team was bowled out for 0 and their opening bowler ended the match immediately with a wide. That might be apocryphal though!
5. snoopthebonedoc - the lowest score never made in a Test is 229, and it's one of 107 scores below 400 which haven't.
7. bigbenny123 - the longest Test duck, both in terms of balls received and time batted, was by Geoff Allott for New Zealand vs South Africa at Auckland in 1999. He batted for 101 minutes and faced 77 balls.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 8)
Comment number 9.
At 21st Apr 2008, Lozza wrote:thank u very much chile, that was exactly what i was looking for.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 9)
Comment number 10.
At 22nd Apr 2008, mileskeeping wrote:Hi Bill,
Could you tell me what are the highest and lowest Test/ODI grounds in the world.
Secondly, which is the highest ground in the world that regularly holds international fixtures between teams other than the Test playing nations and ODI playing nations?
Thank you,
Miles in Hong Kong
Complain about this comment (Comment number 10)
Comment number 11.
At 22nd Apr 2008, Jules wrote:Bill,
There's been a lot of discussion of Steve Harmison's form recently.
I was wondering how his test match bowling figures compare in matches when his friend Andrew Flintoff played, to his figures in games where Flintoff did not play?
Jules, UK
Complain about this comment (Comment number 11)
Comment number 12.
At 22nd Apr 2008, WJH1983 wrote:Hello Bill,
Whilst at school I used to do the gardening for an old English cricketer and footballer who lived in Oundle, Northants. I think he only played one test for England on tour in South Africa in the late forties. He also played professional football and played in one FA cup final - perhaps for west brom. Unfortunately this is all I can remember of him - any ideas as to his name and cricketing record?
Thanks,
Will (Moscow)
Complain about this comment (Comment number 12)
Comment number 13.
At 22nd Apr 2008, stuartwylie wrote:Your answer in Beaders #168 regarding the worst Test bowling analysis prompts me to report that Khan Mohammed is alive and well and living in Ealing, West London. I was fortunate enough to have an interesting cricket conversation with him last summer when he popped into my club, although I was careful not to mention his 'record'.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 13)
Comment number 14.
At 22nd Apr 2008, Hendry's Superhuman wrote:Hi Bill,
In one of my clubs games last season one of my teammates took 5 catches in one innings in outfield positions. What's the highest number taken by a single outfielder in First class and test cricket?
Complain about this comment (Comment number 14)
Comment number 15.
At 22nd Apr 2008, ARTDUBLIN wrote:IanPulsofrd is correct: when both batsmen are at the same end and the wicket at that end is broken, neither is run out. In BF's example the striker would be out, run out if the wicket at the 'keeper's end were broken, even though he has joined the non-striker in the latter's ground.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 15)
Comment number 16.
At 22nd Apr 2008, Rob wrote:I never thought I'd say this, but Bearders' answer on thr un out is wrong (Ian Pulsford is correct).
If both batsmen are in the same crease (e.g. at the bowler's end) when that wicket is broken the non-striker is not out because he's in his ground and the striker is not out because his ground is at the keeper's end where the wicket is still intact.
In this situation, to effect a run out, the fielding team would have to then break the wicket at the keeper's end.
If both batsmen are out of their ground, the batsman who is dismissed is the one nearest to the wicket that is broken when that action occurs.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 16)
Comment number 17.
At 22nd Apr 2008, AndysBlog wrote:Commencement of an Innings:
Whilst I don't doubt the accuracy of the answer. Can you still be timed -out. If so the innings must "start" before the batsman sets foot on the field. Unless they can be out before thier innings commences!!!
Complain about this comment (Comment number 17)
Comment number 18.
At 22nd Apr 2008, Nick6591 wrote:Hi Bill
I remember many years ago in the early 1970's Rodney Redmond being selected for his debut for New Zealand to play against Pakistan in the last test of the series. He scored a century in the first innings and a fifty in the second. He never played another test.
Are there any other good examples of "one test wonders", and why did they never get to play again?
Thanks
Nick
Complain about this comment (Comment number 18)
Comment number 19.
At 22nd Apr 2008, tim-faceafrica wrote:I agree
Complain about this comment (Comment number 19)
Comment number 20.
At 23rd Apr 2008, danny_d_b wrote:many players are consided quick scores but which cricket player has the highest stike rate in each form of cricket (first class, od, test, odi)
Complain about this comment (Comment number 20)
Comment number 21.
At 23rd Apr 2008, markjamesrose wrote:Hi Bill,
As a keeper, when can you legitimately carry out a stumping after receiving the ball?
For example, if a batsman plays a forward defensive and misses and the keeper receives the ball, can he then break the wicket if, after a pause of say 2 or 3 seconds, the batsman topples forward out of his ground?
I've seen several occurances of keepers hovering over the stumps hoping a batsman might lose their balance; when is the ball 'dead'?
Thanks!
Mark
Complain about this comment (Comment number 21)
Comment number 22.
At 23rd Apr 2008, UmpinCumbria wrote:Re: Question 21
This is covered in Law 23 Dead Ball. Particularly Law 23.1 (b) "The ball shall be considered to be dead when it is clear to the umpire at the bowler's end that the fielding side and both batsmen at the wicket have ceased to regard it as in play."
And, Law 23.2 Ball finally settled. "Whether the ball is finally settled or not is a matter for the umpire alone to decide."
In other words, as you rightly say, if the batsman wobbles a bit with his back foot the keeper is perfectly correct to wait and see if he unbalances from his crease. Once it is obvious that he won't and the batsmen have no intention to take a run then the ball will be deemed to be dead.
Hope that helps
Complain about this comment (Comment number 22)
Comment number 23.
At 23rd Apr 2008, UmpinCumbria wrote:Hope to help with Question 17 - Timed Out.
Again you are quite right that a batsman must commence his innings by crossing the boundary, to be given, on appeal, Timed Out. This is covered in Law 31.1.(b).
However, if no batsmen appears at all then
Law 21.3.(a) (ii) Refusal to play applies.
Law 21.3.(b) states:
"If an umpire considers that an action by any player or players might constitute a refusal to play then the umpires together shall ascertain the cause of the action. If they then decide together that this action does constitute a refusal to play by one side, they shall so inform the captain of that side. If the captain persists in the action the umpires shall award the match in accordance with (a) (ii) above."
Hope that helps again :-)
Complain about this comment (Comment number 23)
Comment number 24.
At 23rd Apr 2008, Nick6591 wrote:#20 concerning quick scoring batsmen
For ODI, if the minimum no of career runs is 100 then Dmitri Mascarenhas has scored 127 off 96 balls - strike rate of 132.29. If the minimum runs is 500, then LOB Cann (Bermuda) has 543 off 454 (SR=119.6). But the outstanding fast scorer (over 1000 career runs) is Shahid Afridi with 5413 off 4864 (SR=111.28)
For tests, it is not quite so clear as records in the past do not necessarily record the number of balls faced. However, in more modern times the winner is ... Shahid Afridi!! ... with 1683 off 1954 (sr=86.13).
No idea about first class matches.
Nick
Complain about this comment (Comment number 24)
Comment number 25.
At 23rd Apr 2008, KomlaNokwe wrote:#18: Wikipedia says, up to September 2006, there were 377 鈥渙ne test wonders鈥 (they list over 100). Apart from Rodney Redmond, only Andy Ganteaume scored a century (for WI in 1948). Some are stopgaps for the home side. But other than that, it is probably pointless to ask 鈥渨hy鈥 the selectors kept picking someone else. Like: why did we keep electing Thatcher (or Blair), and why do we always go to the same grotty resort for our holidays?
Complain about this comment (Comment number 25)
Comment number 26.
At 23rd Apr 2008, stu_d_apples wrote:Has any player ever been given out all ten ways (bowled, caught, lbw, stumped, run out, hit wicket, handled the ball, obstructing the field, timed out, hitting ball twice) in his Test career? If not who has been given out the most different kinds of way?
Complain about this comment (Comment number 26)
Comment number 27.
At 23rd Apr 2008, Alan Hughes wrote:Bill -
Two questions:
1) Which Test Grounds have the highest and lowest averages for batting and bowling?
2) (If possible) Which batsman has faced the highest percentage of balls in a completed innings?
Complain about this comment (Comment number 27)
Comment number 28.
At 23rd Apr 2008, gmtx725 wrote:Jules-
In the 39 matches he has played alongside Andrew Flintoff, Steve Harmison has taken 142 wickets at an average of 32.02 and a strike rate of 60.2
This compares to his entire test career of 57 matches, 212 wickets at an average of 31.39 with a strike rate of 58.5
Complain about this comment (Comment number 28)
Comment number 29.
At 24th Apr 2008, Gopallawa wrote:What is the Carrom Ball and how did this term originate? A friend of mine says new Sri Lankan spinning sensation Ajantha Mendis bowls this type of ball and was told that leading cricket analysts such as Rob M Steen and Tim de Lisle are intrigued by the term. I reckon this is the latest cricketing term since reverse awing and doosra.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 29)
Comment number 30.
At 24th Apr 2008, KomlaNokwe wrote:#29 - I think there is a game called Carrom (played in Sri Lanka, India and elsewhere) which involves flicking discs with the finger. I gather the carrom ball in cricket uses a flicking motion, so perhaps that is where the name comes from.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 30)
Comment number 31.
At 24th Apr 2008, sirjonno59 wrote:Run Out
Have to agree with Ianpulsford that the wicket at the striker's end would have to be broken. Confirm please MR. Frindall
Complain about this comment (Comment number 31)
Comment number 32.
At 25th Apr 2008, Giarcy wrote:Bill
Enjoy your column, you have a fantastic job!
It looks like the new Australian wicketkeeper, Brad Haddin, will make his test debut in the West Indies next month. How many test players have played in test matches overseas but never in their home country?
Giarcy
Malaysia
Complain about this comment (Comment number 32)
Comment number 33.
At 25th Apr 2008, ccottis wrote:Re #27
I'm fairly sure no-one has been timed out in test matches. I don't remember anyone being given out obsructed the field or hit the bll twice either but they may have happened.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 33)
Comment number 34.
At 25th Apr 2008, PortoIan wrote:question 26 - stu-d-apples
no test player has ever been given out in two of the 10 ways, TIMED OUT or HIT BALL TWICE
the only player gievn out in tests OBSTRUCTING FIELD was len hutton, however he was never given out HANDLED BALL, but 7 others were (gooch, vaughan, s waugh, haynes, m khan, hilditch and endean)
of these HUTTON, HAYNES and WAUGH were also out HIT WICKET, so they are the joint record holders with 7
i'd also like to point out that 2 batsman have been out another way in tests-RETIRED OUT (different from retired hurt, which is not out) Attapattu and Jayawardene, both in the same test vs Bangladesh in 2001, but as neither have ever been out hit wkt then they don't have 7 types
Complain about this comment (Comment number 34)
Comment number 35.
At 25th Apr 2008, PortoIan wrote:sorry i should clarify the BATSMAN RETIRE OUT (before the questions start)
from LAW 2. Point 9 (my CAPS)
A batsman may retire at any time during his innings. The umpires... shall be informed of the reason for a batsman retiring.
(a) If a batsman retires because of ... unavoidable cause, he is entitled to resume his innings ... If for any reason he does not do so, his innings is to be recorded as -Retired 'not out'.
(b) If a batsman retires for any reason other than as in (a) above, he may only resume his innings with the consent of the opposing captain. IF FOR ANY REASON HE DOES NOT RESUME HIS INNINGS IT IS TO BE RECORDED AS RETIRED "OUT"
...
Complain about this comment (Comment number 35)
Comment number 36.
At 25th Apr 2008, Taiho7777 wrote:I'm an American who has become fascinated by cricket over the past several years, and by its many contrasts with baseball. Has there ever been a major league baseball player who tried to make the transition to cricket, or a first-class cricket player who did the same to baseball? With what success?
Complain about this comment (Comment number 36)
Comment number 37.
At 25th Apr 2008, Nick6591 wrote:#36: Taiho
Not sure if there has ever been anyone playing both cricket and baseball at any reasonable standard. But if you're interested, you may want to read "Playing Hard Ball" by Ed Smith, who plays for Kent and has played 3 tests for England. The book is about his interest in baseball and comparisons with cricket. I believe he has tried out a bit of baseball, but I can't remember at waht sort of standard.
Nick
Complain about this comment (Comment number 37)
Comment number 38.
At 25th Apr 2008, stu_d_apples wrote:"23. At 1:46 pm on 23 Apr 2008, UmpinCumbria wrote:
Hope to help with Question 17 - Timed Out.
Again you are quite right that a batsman must commence his innings by crossing the boundary, to be given, on appeal, Timed Out. This is covered in Law 31.1.(b).
However, if no batsmen appears at all then
Law 21.3.(a) (ii) Refusal to play applies.
Law 21.3.(b) states:
"If an umpire considers that an action by any player or players might constitute a refusal to play then the umpires together shall ascertain the cause of the action. If they then decide together that this action does constitute a refusal to play by one side, they shall so inform the captain of that side. If the captain persists in the action the umpires shall award the match in accordance with (a) (ii) above."
Hope that helps again :-)"
Thanks for trying but I was asking if anyone had ever been given out all ten ways in his career.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 38)
Comment number 39.
At 26th Apr 2008, Bryant24 wrote:Sachin Tendulkar, who made his debut in 1989, is about 19 months shy of entering into the fourth decade of his illustrious career. Has anybody ever played in four decades of continuous international cricket before? And what's the longest continuous Test career in terms of number of years?
Beburg Zehri, Oakville, Canada
Complain about this comment (Comment number 39)
Comment number 40.
At 26th Apr 2008, stoatsnest wrote:When I was at school in Cape Town in the 1950's, we had a coach whose surname was Newman. I understood he had played County cricket in England, and struck me as being fairly old. Did he play, and if so for whom?
Complain about this comment (Comment number 40)
Comment number 41.
At 28th Apr 2008, haris1311 wrote:Hello Bill,
I was wondering what is the highest number of runs scored by a chasing side in the final over, fourth innings of a test match, and the same for the final over of any first class match? Who were the batsmen, and did the batting sides go on to win?
Thank you,
Haris, London.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 41)
Comment number 42.
At 28th Apr 2008, CreamCakeHes wrote:Hi Bill
In a club cricket match last season our overseas player was given out "stumped". The situation was the ball had brushed his shoulder and after half an appeal for caught behind the umpire gave him not out. Probably about 5 seconds later he moved out of his crease to do some "gardening". The wicket keeper, still having the ball in his hand threw down the stumps and appealed for stumped. The square leg umpire giving him out.
A crucial decision in the game, which we went on to narrowly lose.
Was the umpire correct in giving him out? Surely this is not in the spirit of the game. What do you think?
Complain about this comment (Comment number 42)
Comment number 43.
At 28th Apr 2008, msummer2 wrote:Bill, I bought a commemerative cricket ball at auction in Liverpool. It was presented to A.D. Milne for taking all 10 wickets in a match between Huyton CC and Birkenhead CC on April 25, 1936. Do you have any information on A.D. Milne?
Thanks
Mike from Pennsylvania, USA
Complain about this comment (Comment number 43)
Comment number 44.
At 29th Apr 2008, JonnyEnt wrote:Bill,
Following Marcus Trescothick's recent retirement from Test and ODI cricket, it got me thinking "was he englands best batsman of the modern era". This prompted my question for you Bill, "who hs scored the most runs for England since the turn of the century?"
Regards
Jonathan Entwistle
Complain about this comment (Comment number 44)
Comment number 45.
At 29th Apr 2008, uglyducklingII wrote:Hello Bill, great column always good for half an hours clandestine skiving...
At Hove last week for the championship game with Kent, all our party agreed that the visiting no.11 batsman, Yasir Arafat, was clearly a more accomplished player than one of his team's opening batsman, James Tredwell. Playfair confirmed that this was borne out in their respective career averages. Admittedly Yasir was down as no.10, demoted after the deployment of a nightwatchman, but all the same, it got me wondering if there were many (any?) famous cases of number 11's being better bats than their own openers?
Complain about this comment (Comment number 45)
Comment number 46.
At 29th Apr 2008, Tom Rutherford wrote:Re #42 - It's impossible to comment on a specific umpiring decision without having been there, and seen the full details. The Laws say that the ball is dead when "finally settled" in the hands of the 'keeper or bowler, and that this is a matter for the umpire alone to decide.
Evidently in your game the umpire felt that the ball was not "finally settled", and thus when the wicket was broken with the bastman out of his ground, a decision for a stumping was the correct one.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 46)
Comment number 47.
At 9th May 2008, RobStewardson wrote:Hi Bill.
In Nottinghamshire's current County Championship match against Kent all of Nottinghamshire's batsmen were out caught in their first innings. Whilst i'm fairly sure that this won't be the first occurence, is it a regular event and how many, if any times have an entire side been all bowled or all LBW?
Cheers,
Rob.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 47)
Comment number 48.
At 11th May 2008, marmarzet wrote:Hi Bill,
How many times has a one-day match finished wicketless? That is, both pairs of openning batsmen batting through the whole 50overs? Has it ever happened in an ODI?
Mar, Battersea
Complain about this comment (Comment number 48)