A new home
They gathered together, the great and the good from a cross-section of Scottish society.
The occasion - the official opening of 91Èȱ¬ Scotland's gleaming new headquarters, built at a cost of £188m, on the banks of the River Clyde in Glasgow.
Staff lined the passageways on all five floors to listen to the speakers, Sir Michael Lyons, chairman of the 91Èȱ¬ Trust; director general Mark Thompson and the guest of honour, Prime Minister Gordon Brown.
Pacific Quay represents a model of what the 91Èȱ¬ wants to become... a "test-bed" was how Mark Thompson described it.
New digital production systems turning out more, engaging programmes for radio and television and multimedia content online. New working practices, with teams of journalists and other production staff collaborating more closely, stirring the creative spirit, sparking new ideas.
Openness is a theme of this building (you can see pictures of it ). Even the controller, Ken McQuarrie, sits in the open. In fact, one of the few places where staff can close and lock a door behind them is the unisex toilets (which remain a topic of fairly heated discussion).
Scotland can be an uncomfortable place for London-based 91Èȱ¬ executives. The director-general referred to the first time eight years ago when he set foot on the then undeveloped wasteland that was Pacific Quay.
Then, he said, there was a "very lively" debate about broadcasting in Scotland. Today is no different and the themes remain broadly similar, with critics labelling the 91Èȱ¬ the "EBC", or "English Broadcasting Corporation".
Devolution - and more significantly, the outcome of May's Scottish Parliament elections - has moved the goalposts. The SNP-led Scottish Government (itself a contentious title) has launched a commission to look into the state of Scottish broadcasting.
At the heart of the debate is the 3% the 91Èȱ¬ currently spends in Scotland on producing television programmes which are seen across the entire UK network. First Minister Alex Salmond wants that figure to rise to 9%, which represents the proportion of the UK population in Scotland.
Today, Mark Thompson played the ball back into the politician's court. He told the audience that network deliveries from 91Èȱ¬ Scotland "can and must grow to at least its proportion of the UK population".
He referred to this as a "floor, rather than a ceiling", echoing Mr Salmond's own words delivered last month when he announced the commission.
And so the debate goes on.
Whilst today was about looking forward, history was given its due place in the proceedings.
Mark Thompson remarked that the gathering was standing on Prince's Dock, the former name of Pacific Quay. George Reith, grandfather of the 91Èȱ¬'s imposing founder John Reith, had been instrumental in the excavation of the dock.
John Reith's daughter Marista was in the audience. In a book about her father, she talked about his "tall ghost" still stalking the corridors of Broadcasting House in London.
Reith's original office table from Savoy Hill has been restored and placed in the controller's area on the third floor of Pacific Quay, prompting the caution that Kenny McQuarrie shouldn't be surprised if he felt a "stooped and vigilant figure looking over his shoulder".
There were nostalgic words too from Gordon Brown. It was only a few yards away, beside the shipyards of Govan, where his father began his Church of Scotland ministry in 1937.
To be present 70 years later at the opening of Pacific Quay was to send out a message of faith in the regeneration of Glasgow, once the "workshop of the world".
So, warm words and high hopes. After the dignitaries have left and Pacific Quay finds its natural rhythm, 91Èȱ¬ Scotland's new home will be judged by the output it produces.
It feels a wee bit like we're in a goldfish bowl with the rest of the 91Èȱ¬ and licence-fee payers looking in. Now it's down to us to get the best out of our investment.
Comments
I would be very unhappy if for political reasons the proportion of 91Èȱ¬ output being generated in Scotland was pushed up to a certain percentage to represent the share of Scots in the UK population, regardless of quality or relevance.
No other part of the UK is being offered this slightly Faustian pact. I know the Scots will argue that Scotland is different but Wales, Northern Ireland and the English regions can also make the case that they are special.
The answer is to make sure good programmes are planned and made in Scotland which can be selected for broadcast on merit. Floors and ceilings can quickly become very slippery slopes if the ground is tilted!
Two predictions about the new building:
1. Within the next year, it will win at least one architectural award.
2. Within the next year, staff who work there will begin complaining about things going wrong - heating not working, impractical layout of offices, coffe machines breaking down, etc.
These two predictions are not unrelated. Like many new buildings, it looks great, at the expense of practicality.
I'm sure Jeremy Paxman is ecstatic at this news, and only to pleased to think that the proposed 20% cut to Newsnight's budget is a price worth paying for this.
Economics of the madhouse. I am Welsh and am pleased that the 91Èȱ¬ spends money on regional programming.
But here is a bit of newsflash, folks. Newsnight covers news in Zimbabwe. It covers news in the USA. It covers news in Europe. It covers what is going on in the Middle East. It covers, in more detail than I've seen anywhere else on the Beeb, what is going on in Africa.
The facile proposition above that we Welsh and Scottish don't give a stuff about what is going on in the rest of the world, and with climate change and globalisation, er, the whole world, is too superficial and banal to warrant a reply.
Wake up and smell the coffee - you've screwed up Horizon, You've screwed up Panorama, you've taken off Tomorrow's World, and you are now about to shaft Newsnight. And you are expecting us to be pleased that you've built yet another bl**dy office to go with the ones you've got planned for Salford ?
Hoo-bl**dy- ray..
Now that we have a new 91Èȱ¬ building in glasgow will we actually see news representing this country. The 91Èȱ¬ is obviously biased against our elected government in scotland. If they are not then why wasnt alex salmond asked to open the building. There is obviously no openess in the 91Èȱ¬ given that they invited Gordon Brown to open it. This is the man who last week stood with the woman who killed shipbuilding on the clyde. We wont forget that in a hurry. Bring on the election gordon.
". . . with critics labelling the 91Èȱ¬ the "EBC", or "English Broadcasting Corporation".
Sir, these are not youre critics, these are your friends!
Let's hope the quality of the programmes improve from tonights 10:25pm Reporting Scotland, which appeared to be read from a cupboard whilst a nosiy and rowdy party went on outside (hope you all enjoyed yourselves). Poor Sally looked like she couldn't wait to get back out there...
Enough moaning though, all the best in your new home!
All very impressive.
It is just a shame that Reporting Scotland has not had a proper titles revamp since 1999!!!
It is also a shame that I could not hear tonight's late bulletin as all I could here was chatter in the background.
State of the art sound facilities indeed???
Just watched the 1030 News Bulletin from Pacific Quay. Pictures nice but couldn't hear a word the presenter ws saying due to the party in progress ! "Openness" may be the buzz word but a sound proof studio would be an original concept. Makes the future of broadcasting a worrying prospect.
The 91Èȱ¬ has yet another labour biased story on its website. Does the 91Èȱ¬ not have any stock pictures of SNP or any other political party except London labour. I want to see pictures and articles on the scottish government. Does anyone at the 91Èȱ¬ even know what any of the scottish government ministers look like. It seems unlikely because we never actually see pictures of them. LIsten 91Èȱ¬ you may have a labour government at westminster but we have the SNP in scotland and I get more and more angry the less i see that reflected on the 91Èȱ¬ website. I am quite sure if you ask the scottish government for a few pictures they will be happy to oblige. Anyone reading the articles on the politics page will either think that the snp is manned solely by alex salmond or is in fact an offshoot of the labour party. Stop it 91Èȱ¬ and Stop it NOW.
Another brand new building. Your TV Tax at work.,...
As the 91Èȱ¬ obviously still has money to burn can we now assume that you will stop pushing for continued rises in the licence fee?
The 91Èȱ¬ has not been worth the licence fee in years, yet the licence fee continues to go up. The only 91Èȱ¬ service I used regularly is this web site which I could use for free if I didn't pay for the licence.
The only time I watched the 91Èȱ¬ this week was to see Heroes - a show that was first shown on abother channel.
Glasgow sells a modern dynamic image to the world and ups Scotlands image .Im glad the media are not in Edinburgh it would be more of the same Tartan kilts haggis neeps & more tartan,Oh and im from Edinburgh ,Well done Glasgow.
Please, please, please no more development of regional broadcasting. In Northern Ireland we suffer annoyingly frequent regional opt outs for local dross which is repeated ad nauseam. The local talent is simply not there to sustain the output which the Regional Contaoller inflicts on us.
The 91Èȱ¬ should be a national broadcaster and should leave the independents to see if the market will bear yet another repeat of some local nonentity riding his favourite hobby horse.
Congratulations on your new building. But what on earth was going on with last night's Reporting Scotland (10.25pm)?
Couldn't make out a word the newsreader was saying as it sounded like the programme was being broadcast from a Weatherspoons pub!
Absolutely shocking.
Is this the way it's supposed to be? Are the studios not sound-proofed?
No apology - but that seems to be par for the course.
Radio Scotland listeners in the Highlands never get an apology when, as has happened numerous times this year, the 7.50am or 4.54pm news for the Highlands and Islands fails to appear - or appears midway through its scheduled broadcast.
Couldn't agree more with #13 which is why Scotland needs to rid itself of the 91Èȱ¬ and establish a national broadcaster. Roll on the SBC!
So when will there be a 91Èȱ¬ England?
It is gleeming, and it is new, but it is also an unimaginative Stalinist block. My God, you're supposed to be a CULTURAL organization, 91Èȱ¬...!! There are creative architects all over the place, not least of all in the UK. And this is the best that the 91Èȱ¬ could do? This is a missed opportunity and a darned shame.
On budget and on time one would hope.
Environmentally friendly too? Not that the 91Èȱ¬ have a line on climate change you understand. All that glass must make for a hot building in summer. Those are photovoltaic windows, right? And the expanse of roof is home to some sizeable wind turbines as well?
I'll not hold my breath.
Another house for the Labour Propaganda Media Unit - should we be grateful?
Canada: "It is gleeming, and it is new, but it is also an unimaginative Stalinist block."
I agree. Pretty dreadful, really. But still not so bad as that eyesore in Edinburgh. But if Alex Salmond wants it to generate output proportional to the Scottish population, why didn't you just buy a big shed?