91Èȱ¬

91Èȱ¬ BLOGS - The Editors
« Previous | Main | Next »

91Èȱ¬ in the news, Thursday

Host Host | 10:09 UK time, Thursday, 19 October 2006

The Times: Reports that the 91Èȱ¬ has decided that religious symbols can be worn by newsreaders, but that they must not distract viewers (based on this blog entry). ()

The Guardian: A report on the ethics of reporting on the Mills/McCartney divorce, featuring comments from the head of 91Èȱ¬ TV News, Peter Horrocks. ()

The Telegraph: "A secret guide that has helped generations of 91Èȱ¬ newsreaders pronounce difficult words and odd-sounding names is to be made public for the first time." ()

Comments

  • 1.
  • At 05:00 PM on 21 Oct 2006,
  • J Westerman wrote:

According to the Times the 91Èȱ¬ has decided that religious symbols must not distract the viewers.
Are they referring to viewers who are not distracted by religious symbols, or religious symbols that no none regards as religious symbols?
My main distraction is the newsreaders. Some of them should be replaced by plainer, more ordinary newsreaders. What is the 91Èȱ¬ to decide about that?

This post is closed to new comments.

91Èȱ¬ iD

91Èȱ¬ navigation

91Èȱ¬ © 2014 The 91Èȱ¬ is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.