Macworld - what's new?
- 6 Jan 09, 22:07 GMT
The crowd was expectant, the media throng hurtled into the hall at the Moscone Centre and fought for the best camera position, and the audience gave the speaker the usual warm welcome accorded to the keynote presenter at Macworld.
So why did an hour and a half spent listening to details of Apple's shiny new products leave me just slightly underwhelmed - at least until the last five minutes? I don't think it was entirely the fault of Steve Jobs' less than charismatic stand-in Phil Schiller. Sure, he didn't pepper his keynote with as many "awesomes" and "really cools" as his boss. But then he didn't have anything really awesome to unveil.
When he started with a slide promising Three New Things, I was mildly excited. An iPhone nano? A tiny notebook computer? A big price cut? Err, no.
First, we had nearly an hour on an upgrade to the iLife suite of software. Sure, the upgrades to iMovie and iPhoto looked great. Facial recognition and geo-tagging is a clever way or organising your photos, and iMovie's latest incarnation seriously impressed my cameraman who uses far more expensive professional video editing software. But, hey, we get an upgrade to iLife every year, don't we? Hardly really new, and we didn't need all the wearisome details.
Then another twenty minutes on an upgrade to iWork, Apple's productivity software. But does anyone really use this rival to Microsoft Office, apart from hardcore Mac devotees who wouldn't sully their hands with anything emanating from Redmond? Ah, but here was something really revolutionary - iwork.com. So Apple will now allow you to put your documents online in the "cloud" so that they can be accessed anywhere by anyone. But even though it will start off as a free beta, it will eventually become a paid-for service. Just a minute - Google offers something similar , if less sophisticated, for nothing. So is this really going to change the world.
The final "new" thing was a 17" Macbook Pro. So does an extra two inches really count as novel? Phil Schiller made great play of a battery life of up to eight hours. That sounds great - but it's achieved by embedding the battery in the laptop. So in the unlikely event that the power supply fails, you will end up being without your computer for days while it is repaired.
That was the point I got up and headed for the exit to tell my bosses in London that Macworld had produced nothing new. But luckily there was One More Thing - and it was pretty good.
The deal with the big four record labels to make every track on iTunes DRM-free may well be the day that marks the demise of the copy-protection software for music. It's also an important moment in the fractious relationship between Apple and the music industry. Each side has got a bit of what it wanted - Apple has the DRM-free music Steve Jobs called for nearly two years ago, while the labels have got some wriggle room on pricing, with three different prices for tracks.
So we were relieved to emerge at last with a story. But for me the highlight was the show's finale, Tony Bennett singing "The Best is Yet To Come." The only problem was that the Apple faithful emerged from the Moscone Centre wondering whether that was really true.
The 91Èȱ¬ is not responsible for the content of external internet sites
Comment number 1.
At 7th Jan 2009, enzos2 wrote:The word is factious.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 1)
Comment number 2.
At 7th Jan 2009, Jimmy James wrote:This is exactly the reason Apple are not doing these shows anymore. If they don't release "The Next Big Thing" it's classed as a failure.
iWork and iLife '09 look good, but this wasn't the venue to launch them at.
Phil did well, but he's no Steve Jobs.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 2)
Comment number 3.
At 7th Jan 2009, michael11111 wrote:Hi
I'd be really interested to know how many staff we paid for the 91Èȱ¬ to send to such a non event.
Rory was left to trying to justify it by claiming DRM was a story...
Complain about this comment (Comment number 3)
Comment number 4.
At 7th Jan 2009, Mark_MWFC wrote:A pretty good summary, Rory. This was the poorest Macworld I can remember.
The only thing of interest was the removal of DRM from iTunes - something that Apple were kind of forced to concede to the record labels' terms to do. The new Macbook Pro is a bit pointless and already behind the curve when compared to Lenovo's W700 series and, as you point out no-one really cares about iWork.
Sound and fury signifying nothing.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 4)
Comment number 5.
At 7th Jan 2009, EnglishFolkfan wrote:Times and needs change such that Apple should have total control over what and when it announces or launches new hardware or software and not be at the behest of a Macworld Show timetable.
I am pretty sure that the Apple marketing, finance and developers departments will be happy to see the end of this enforced timetable.
Me? Well, after the past couple of decades or so of scheduled Macworld's, I look forward to being surprised and delighted by the random timing of any new Apple Mac news and goodies; and yes I've been an Apple user that long as well.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 5)
Comment number 6.
At 8th Jan 2009, sjholland wrote:While Apple are innovation leaders, I am still waiting the blog about the innovations microsoft announced at CES.
When I woke up this morning, I was expecting one but low and behold, it wasn't there and is still not here at the time of writing this.
We know you like apple and google 91Èȱ¬ but come on!
Complain about this comment (Comment number 6)
Comment number 7.
At 11th Jan 2009, Ltsgosrfn wrote:Er, no it isn't. It is fractious.
fractious |'frak sh ?s|
adjective
easily irritated; bad-tempered : they fight and squabble like fractious children.
• (of an organization) difficult to control; unruly : the fractious coalition of Social Democrats.
DERIVATIVES
fractiously |'frøk??sli| adverb
fractiousness |'frøk??sn?s| noun
ORIGIN late 17th cent.: from fraction , probably on the pattern of the pair faction, factious.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 7)