News round-up: More concern about benefits changes
Disability campaigners reached fever pitch earlier this year with protests and warnings, and gradually now we're seeing considered concern from diverse sources with long-established reputations.
Understandably the government are keen to get as many people into the workplace as possible and indeed most disabled people who are able enough, welcome this principle, they want to play a part in building the country, and earn more money for themselves in so doing. But a question mark still hangs over what all these changes will do, how severe the consequences might be ... or maybe even how genius Iain Duncan Smith is for finally breaking the so-called benefits trap that many accept is all too real.
A readers comment at the bottom of the Guardian article asks: Am I wrong in thinking that prison [might] offer a better alternative to disabled people than dying cold and hungry and unnoticed in their homes. All the services disabled people need are under one roof. There is also paid work for prisoners within the system."
On the aforementioned report, the newspaper quoted a DWP spokesman referring to the analysis as: "highly selective".
Elsewhere in the news
(The Telegraph, Friday 13 July)
(Daily Mail, Friday 13 July)
(Daily Mail, Friday 13 July)
Breast cancer surgery women 'risk more operations' (91Èȱ¬ News, Friday 13 July)
(The Telegraph, Thursday 12 July)
Concerns over tackling Olympics overcrowding in London stations (91Èȱ¬ News, Thursday 12 July)
Alzheimer's 'early signs timeline developed' (91Èȱ¬ News, Wednesday 11 July)
Social care plans 'simply paper over cracks' (91Èȱ¬ News, Wednesday 11 July)
(The Guardian, Wednesday 11 July)
Remploy to close 27 factories, government confirms (91Èȱ¬ News, Tuesday 10 July)
London 2012: Disabled artists launch Unlimited Festival (91Èȱ¬ News, Tuesday 10 July)
GB athletics team named for London Paralympics (91Èȱ¬ Sport, Tuesday 10 July)
(The Guardian, Tuesday 10 July)
Social care cap plans 'need funding and timetable' (91Èȱ¬ News, Saturday 7 July)
(The Daily Mail, Saturday 7 July)
Comment number 1.
At 21st Jul 2012, Siddhi Panchal wrote:This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 1)