Changes to DLA will go ahead but with concessions and Tony Blair's father in law fights Westminster parking officials
The government fought off a renewed challenge to its highly unpopular welfare reform bill on Tuesday night. Peers rejected a proposal to delay plans to replace disability Living Allowance with a new benefit called Personal Independence Payments by just 16 votes after ministers offered consessions.
Tony Blair's father in law, veteran actor Tony Booth, is after police told him he couldn't park in front of his daughter Cherie's Connaught Square home. They directed him around the back to Archery Place where he received a ticket despite clearly displaying his blue badge.
Reacting in The Evening Standard Mr.Booth said,
"someone must do something about Westminster's attitude to the disabled. Maybe I should arrange a march on City Hall? It is a Tory council. Perhaps we should call on all disabled people to vote against Boris?"
Elsewhere in the news
The cheapest way to go to the Olympics - 91Èȱ¬ News
Depression drugs 'causing falls'- (91Èȱ¬ News)
- (The Guardian)
- (The Guardian)
(Comment is free, The Guardian)
- (Business World Weekender)
Independent life / How a 1960s student with polio inspired disability rights
DLA changes: Tanni Grey-Thompson and Iain Duncan Smith (91Èȱ¬ News)
(The Society Guardian)
(Society Guardian)
(Suzanne Moore's column in the Daily Mail)
(The Guardian)
(The Daily Express)
Type 1 diabetes discovery by Cardiff University and King's College (91Èȱ¬ News)
(Comment is Free, The Guardian)
(The Daily Mail)
(The Independent)
(The Independent)
Comment number 1.
At 14th Mar 2012, martin153 wrote:All this user's posts have been removed.Why?
Complain about this comment (Comment number 1)
Comment number 2.
At 19th Jul 2012, maggie wrote:It seems like the DLA got their way in the end Thanks for the unbiased reporting that you do and saying it as it is.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 2)
Comment number 3.
At 20th Jan 2013, martin153 wrote:All this user's posts have been removed.Why?
Complain about this comment (Comment number 3)