91Èȱ¬

« Previous | Main | Next »

Presbyterian leader admits to a "bad start" on the PMS crisis

Post categories: ,Ìý,Ìý

William Crawley | 17:44 UK time, Monday, 22 November 2010

Two years ago, when the Presbyterian Mutual Society went into Administration, the Presbyterian Church in Ireland made it clear to the press that the PMS was a "separate legal entity" and that it was a mistake to regard the mutual as an agency of the church. They may both have "Presbyterian" in their names, they may even share a website and an email address, but, we were told, it is important not to confuse them. At the time, some members of the PMS regarded this as an attempt by some church leaders to distance themselves and the church from the troubled mutual, even though the church's General Assembly received an annual report from the PMS and openly encouraged congregations and church members to avail themselves of the PMS's services.

On Yesterday's Sunday Sequence, the former moderator who is handling the Presbyterian Church's response to the PMS crisis, Dr Stafford Carson (pictured), gave the clearest signal yet that his church's initial media strategy was a mistake. Here's an excerpt from my interview with Stafford Carson.

Stafford Carson: "Passing the two-year mark, I think it's important to record just how much progress has been made in terms of the overall crisis. You'll recall that we began this whole crisis with nobody really being interesting in us, and the government not paying much attention --"

William Crawley: "You say "us", meaning the Presbyterian Mutual Society?"

Stafford Carson: "Yes."

William Crawley: "Because we started this situation with the Presbyterian Church denying that you were "us"."

Stafford Carson: "We'll of course we probably got off to a bad start on that one. Many of us are both savers and members of the Presbyterian Church ..."

Listen to Sunday's programme in full here.

Comments

  • Comment number 1.

    I do not think the victims of the PMS collapse will be comforted by Dr Carson's talk of how much progress has been made in the past two years. PMS savers have been very badly let down by the Presbyterian Church which slammed the door shut in their faces, so to speak. Now the 10,000 or so PMS victims have been told they will have to wait until next year's budget before they can receive anything, that PMS directors face disqualification and that the auditors of PMS are being investigated!

    Why wasn't the £4.2 million used to renovate the Church's head office not put towards helping the victims?

    Why should taxpayers bail out the PMS which was not a properly registered society?

    I do not think that Dr Carson is the person best placed to champion the cause of PMS victims.





Ìý

91Èȱ¬ iD

91Èȱ¬ navigation

91Èȱ¬ © 2014 The 91Èȱ¬ is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.