God is not dead, but capitalism is
That's according to the leader of the Catholic Church in England and Wales, Cardinal Cormac Murphy O'Connor.
Is it ironic that the cardinal made the claim at a "lavish" ?
Last month, the cardinal said, "Religious leaders are not normally economists, however, they cannot ignore the damaging human consequences of the rise and fall of economic indicators. Behind the gloomy headlines are cities, neighbourhoods, families, individuals deeply affected by the economic breakdown; and the hardest hit will be the poor: those already struggling to survive. Christians have a paramount concern for the poor. This "preferential option for the poor" is a constant theme in Catholic social teaching."
His most recent comments follow the attack on the government's anti-recession policy launched at Christmas by five Anglican bishops who said the New Labour stategy was "morally corrupt".
Comment number 1.
At 6th Jan 2009, MarcusAureliusII wrote:Religious leaders are just angry that their own financial situation is as bleak as everyone elses. If god really spoke to them, he'd have warned them to get out of the stock market before it crashed. Proof positive they are as clueless as the rest of us. They should consider that this is HIS way of making them experience real poverty even if they won't hornor their vows. Perhaps HE hates what they do. If they followed "HIS word" they wouldn't have the trappings of royalty. I wonder what the Pope's ring is worth. Just think of how many hungry mouths it could feed if it were auctioned off at Sothebys. Black tie dinner? They should be eating gruel just like some of the Bhuddist monks do. Now they know what a life of deprivation and poverty are about. They're better Christians than the Christians.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 1)
Comment number 2.
At 6th Jan 2009, John Wright wrote:Capitalism, dead? Haha. Hahaha. A guy walks into a bar....
Complain about this comment (Comment number 2)
Comment number 3.
At 6th Jan 2009, petermorrow wrote:Two things,
Marcus I know I trust God (that's a less grand statement than it sounds!) and you don't, but on the ring thing, you're right, there really isn't any argument against your view here.
And, from the Telegraph story, "A spokesman for the Cardinal said: "They were private remarks at a private dinner." "
Well, that's just a dumb comment.
Private remarks at a private dinner... dumb diddy dumb dumb, dumb dumb.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 3)
Comment number 4.
At 6th Jan 2009, portwyne wrote:Hearing the Cardinal proclaim the death of capitalism in Claridge's reminds me of the undoubtedly apocryphal story a friend of mine related after returning from a conference in Ashford Castle (she, though, swears it is true).
An American fellow delegate asked her if she knew why there were so many clergy in the hotel, she replied that they were there attending a forum on Holy Poverty. The American replied: "Gee, I'd sure like to be around when those guys are discussing clerical celibacy".
Complain about this comment (Comment number 4)
Comment number 5.
At 6th Jan 2009, brianmcclinton wrote:Hi Portwyne:
The hypocrisy of the powerful knows no bounds. I nearly threw up the other night when Jeremy Bowen said that Olmert and Sarkozy were probably sitting down to their 'first course', just as F-16s and helicopter gunships were pounding the poor of Gaza.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 5)
Comment number 6.
At 7th Jan 2009, MarcusAureliusII wrote:Leave it to a died in the wool communist to bring up the war against terror in a discussion of whether or not the Catholic clergy are right about the future of capitalism. His was another dogma thrown on the ash heap of history. Bombs away.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 6)
Comment number 7.
At 7th Jan 2009, Orville Eastland wrote:I tend to dislike organized religion, with the emphasis on the "organized" bit. Denominational structures don't much appeal to me. I can see numerous hypocritical or jealous reasons why they may say things like that. HOWEVER, they have very valid points.
And, correct me if I'm wrong, but the Cardinal may have much of his expenses paid for...but he himself doesn't own much at all. (I disagree with that, but it does have some resemblance to poverty.)
Complain about this comment (Comment number 7)