91热爆

bbc.co.uk Navigation

Knock if you dare

  • Brian Taylor
  • 18 Apr 07, 02:56 PM

For political canvassers, trudging round the streets, life used to be relatively straightforward. Tough on the shoe leather, certainly. Rough on the voice (and, for some, the conscience.)

But, in reality, there was only one strict rule. Don鈥檛 disturb a household during 鈥淐oronation Street鈥 or when there鈥檚 a big football match on the telly.

But what do they do now? There鈥檚 football on the telly all the time. 鈥淕ood evening, sir, I hope you can spare a few moments to discuss our new policy on ferret taming.鈥

鈥淐an you come back later, lad, it鈥檚 Tayport versus Downfield in the Eastern Junior League. It鈥檚 the decider.鈥

Or the soaps. These days our gallant canvassers set out with a manifesto, a pencil - and a copy of the Radio Times.

鈥淪kip that one, Bert, they鈥檒l be watching River City.鈥

鈥淕ive it half an hour, it鈥檚 the rerun of Eastenders.鈥

So, more and more, parties are turning to phone canvassing, pestering the voters at all hours.

Plus they try to target their messages. No more the 50-second shout on the doorstep, bawling out your policy on council tax before the door slams in your face.

Find out the voter鈥檚 interests and obsessions first - then send them a targeted leaflet.

In these Holyrood elections, all parties are saying that the number of undecided voters is substantial - greater than before.

One political strategist suggested to me that women, in particular, had yet to be convinced. That was, it was argued, because women were more inclined to weigh the detail of policies in the balance.

No surprise, therefore, that both the Liberal Democrats and Labour are majoring on family issues today - issues that are, by custom and repute, designed to appeal to women.

The LibDems, for example, believe that such sectoral campaigning can give them the edge in a tight contest where every vote counts. Look for the others doing the same.

Still on the LibDems, they do seem adamant that they won鈥檛 concede a referendum on independence - even a multi-option one.

Three reasons for this. Firstly, they don鈥檛 want independence. They鈥檙e against it. Secondly, appearing to give ground to the SNP now would cut the feet from their candidates in Gordon and elsewhere. Thirdly, their MPs are virulently against the idea - and have been making that known.

Still doesn鈥檛 rule out the idea, entirely. It鈥檚 still about momentum. Privately, senior LibDems accept that if the SNP are the largest party, they would have a moral claim to a share in government.

It would seem perverse to deny that prospect. Right now, though, they鈥檙e challenging the SNP to dump the referendum. If it comes to it, wonder who鈥檒l blink first.

Comments   Post your comment

Of course Lib Dem MPs oppose a SNP/Lib Dem coalition at Holyrood. It would put the kibosh on a Lab/Lib Dem coalition after the next general election - Ming Campbell has decreed and the Scottish party is expected to fall into line...

  • 2.
  • At 03:55 PM on 18 Apr 2007,
  • Marco Biagi wrote:

The Lib Dems game of chicken is short-sighted. While tactically it may make some sense, the SNP will never be the first to blink. For all that the fundamentalist-gradualist wars are long over, Alex Salmond just could not take his party or huge chunks of the SNP voters with him unless there was a referendum.

In the end, independence is more important to the SNP than opposition to even a referendum on independence is to the Lib Dems. Voters also see that. If the Lib Dems don't soften their position, they'll either have to u-turn after the election - not without precedent - or prop up an unpopular Labour party for another four years and face annihilation in 2011 (if they're not no-confidenced before that). Whether voters agree with independence or not, they won't blame the SNP for standing true to their raison d'etre.

  • 3.
  • At 05:17 PM on 18 Apr 2007,
  • Alexander Bisset wrote:

Hmm Grant you seriously have NO IDEA how the Lib Dems think if you think for a moment that "Ming Campbell has decreed...". Nothing is more likely to rouse the antipathy of a Lib Dem member, activist or MSP than someone in the leadership DECREEing something :-)

No any Lib Dem leader knows full well that a leadership decree is doomed to failure. The Lib Dems are a party that works from the grassroots up, not from centralist control. Individual liberties and local freedoms are cherished and a leader as experienced as Ming well knows this.

  • 4.
  • At 05:37 PM on 18 Apr 2007,
  • Bert wrote:

So Brian,

were you at that infamous meeting with Labour reps (as reported in today's Scotsman) ?

Go on spill the beans!


-------------------------
Yes it is strange that although the Lib Dems have one of the most devolved party structures of any of the Uk parties they are beholden to London masters on who they should have a coalition with.

  • 5.
  • At 06:35 PM on 18 Apr 2007,
  • Harry Shanks wrote:

The only thing the Tories have got right is branding the Lib Dems "political prostitutes".

The ultimate in Lib Dem prostitution will be if they enable a discredited Labour Party which loses votes and seats to cling to power.

Surely even the Lib Dems cannot sink THAT low?

Nicol Stephen for First Minister? You're having a laugh!


  • 6.
  • At 01:07 AM on 19 Apr 2007,
  • Katey Lengyel wrote:

No surprises that the SNP have only managed to have a patronising and policy-free "women's day" event where Nicola turned up and did not much then.

The Nats are running this campaign as if they have something meaningful to contribute. Other than a goodness-knows-how-much tax rise, what are they offering working mums, or any mums for that matter?

  • 7.
  • At 09:05 AM on 19 Apr 2007,
  • Peter, Fife wrote:

Sometimes I feel this is a bit like the early worm;

First to knock is listened to
Next to knock, here鈥檚 number two
Third to knock, my mind鈥檚 adrift
Fourth to knock is given short shrift
Fifth to knock is pushing his luck
Sixth to knock, can get to鈥︹︹.

Sorry, but I think this will sum up most peoples opinion of canvassers; although I never claim to represent the silent majority.

As you will see I failed poetry, but the message is always sound.

  • 8.
  • At 11:17 AM on 19 Apr 2007,
  • Malcolm wrote:

Brian,

Can you not put a link on the Election site showing all the polls you can get your hands on as weel as the updated poll of polls?

thanks

Malcolm

  • 9.
  • At 09:59 PM on 19 Apr 2007,
  • John MacLean wrote:

I wouldn't trust the Lib Dems on anything they say, such is their record for hypocrisy and double standards.
I've just received their election leaflet and it states that the SNP have no chance in taking the Kilmarnock & Loudoun seat from Labour. "Everyone knows only the Lib Dems can" so they say. Rather bizzare considering the SNP polled over 11,000 last time to the Lib Dems 1,571.
I'm trying to find out who their candidate Ron Aitken is and where he's actually based.
Maybe one of those nice, honest Liberals can help me out.

  • 10.
  • At 05:17 PM on 22 Apr 2007,
  • Mark Sutherland-Fisher wrote:

The postings this time seem to have wandered off the subject! Doorstep canvassing has virtually died but then under Labour most people are so busy making money they hardly know who their next door neighbours are!
20 years ago as a young candidate in the 1987 general election, I remembered many people telling me I was the first Tory ever to canvass some areas of Shettleston. Usually I was met with good humour, even by those who disagreed with everything they thought I stood for. Only in Dalmarnock was I threatened and subjected to a minor violent attack and that was by Labour party canvassers who called me a carpetbagger, presumably because I lived in Ross-shire and most of them didn't know where anywhere north of Castlecarry arches was! The irony was I was visiting my father's aunt and uncle, Labour voters all their lives, who lived 5 floors up in one of the Allan Street multistorey flats. I was shocked to hear women in Tollcross tell me they didn't know who they were voting for because their husbands hadn't told them yet! Hopefuly those days have gone but many party workers, of any party, volunteers to a man and woman, must be more wary of being attacked when door to door canvassing now than 20 years ago. I remember in the Glasgow Hillhead By-election in 1982 it was suggested more than half a million pieces of paper were pushed through the letterboxes of the good citizens in Glasgow's west end. At least with telephone, internet and other methods of modern canvassing, a few forests won't require to be cut down so we can fill the recycling bins with party literature. As to the end result, the only person who must seriously believe Nicol Who? will be kingmaker must be Nicol Who? I have said throughout the campaign the LibDems will suffer like Labour and nothing in the past 3 weeks makes me change my mind. As the SNP are likely to take Gordon, Argyll and Tweedale from the LibDems and so many parties seeking regional votes, fewer not more seats are likely for Nicol and of course now we hear Tavish Scott (surely the LibDem's Gordon Brown to Nicol Who? as their Tony Blair)is plotting his removal. The 2 parties with most to gain and capable of bringing sane government are the SNP and Tories. Annabel was right to rule out a coalition and the SNP constitution prohibits it. But many SNP MSP's already work very closely with their Tory counterparts and several are honest enough to say they would welcome such a working relationship. IF the SNP are the largest party in terms of seats and popular vote, Labour and the LibDems could never expect the Scottish people to expect them to cobble together another coalition but Alex Salmond running a minority administration with the tacit support of Annabel Goldie in most policy areas except the constitution is indeed a tantalising prospect and it might finally break the stranglehold of former West of Scotland Labour councillors on the running of Scotland, a country which indeeds extends far north of Cumbernauld and far south of Motherwell.

Post a comment

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Comments are moderated, and will not appear on this weblog until the author has approved them.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
    

The 91热爆 is not responsible for the content of external internet sites

91热爆.co.uk