91Èȱ¬ iPlayer press pack January 2010
The January 2010 91Èȱ¬ iPlayer press pack is now available to download as a PDF: 91Èȱ¬ iPlayer Press Pack - Jan 2010. (Ed's update, 23-02-10: The pack we uploaded originally had omitted an episode of Being Human - as pointed out by the very observant kennyliza in this comment. The pack's been updated and is in the same location. PM)
Here are some of the highlights picked out by the Comms team:
- Snow helped to deliver the highest week of total requests in the week of 4-10th Jan with a figure of 23.8 million requests
- 91Èȱ¬ iPlayer on Nintendo Wii continues to perform well, increasing to become 4% of total requests for 91Èȱ¬ iPlayer
- Nintendo's January 10 marketing campaign has lead to an increase of 26% in the number of weekly requests from Dec 09
The beta product of 91Èȱ¬ iPlayer on Freesat is being made available to a wider audience with the removal of the 4 digit code needed to access the product(Ed's update: For technical reasons the PIN hasn't been removed as yet.)
Paul Murphy is the Editor of the 91Èȱ¬ Internet blog.
Comment number 1.
At 22nd Feb 2010, alaninbelfast wrote:Having used iPlayer via Wii last night for first time in anger, I'm not surprised usage is taking off. It brings on-demand to the TV set (a precursor to Canvas!), the the quality of picture is better than our analogue signal.
But I notices that nations programming is lacking. IS that a feature of the Wii scheduling or transcoding that it's only the network programmes that tend to appear and be searchable?
Complain about this comment (Comment number 1)
Comment number 2.
At 22nd Feb 2010, kennyliza wrote:Hi Paul,
I think there's an error in the TV top 20s? "Being Human" s2e1 is reported in one column but not the other when its rating implies it should be in both...
K
Complain about this comment (Comment number 2)
Comment number 3.
At 23rd Feb 2010, Paul Murphy wrote:#2 kennyliza wrote:
I think there's an error in the TV top 20s? "Being Human" s2e1 is reported in one column but not the other when its rating implies it should be in both...
Hi kennyliza
I've spoken to the press team and you are correct! The PDF has been updated and is in the same location to download. Well spotted,
Thanks for that,
Paul
Complain about this comment (Comment number 3)
Comment number 4.
At 24th Feb 2010, All About iPhone wrote:What's the problem in measuring iPhone iPlayer data?
Ta.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 4)
Comment number 5.
At 24th Feb 2010, James wrote:Can someone at the 91Èȱ¬ please explain why open source SWF players have been blocked from accessing the iplayer
This change means that I cannot continue to use XBMC to access the 91Èȱ¬ feeds. I would have thought that you want to encourage open source access to the 91Èȱ¬ from within the UK!
See for further details.
regards
James
Complain about this comment (Comment number 5)
Comment number 6.
At 24th Feb 2010, HarryChattaway wrote:Wow! That's pretty cool, do you think it is worth me doing something like that for my website?[Unsuitable/Broken URL removed by Moderator] Like how many visitors we get - would the local news be interested in that? If not, what else could I do get featured in the news?
Complain about this comment (Comment number 6)
Comment number 7.
At 24th Feb 2010, TV Licence fee payer against 91Èȱ¬ censorship wrote:#5. At 1:09pm on 24 Feb 2010, James wrote:
"Can someone at the 91Èȱ¬ please explain why open source SWF players have been blocked from accessing the iplayer..//.."
DRM and other copyright protection issues I suspect.
I'm all for 'Open Source' but also accept that open source software can't (be definition) provide some software. I would prefer that .swf files were not even used for video/audio, after all they are just other formats wrapped in a .swf header-footer so why not just use the native format, unfortunately those native formats do not offer the necessary content management control that is needed.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 7)
Comment number 8.
At 25th Feb 2010, Andy H wrote:Hi I love the 91Èȱ¬ i-Player and use it most days on my desk-top PC. Having used iPlayer via Wii last night I am not quiet so happy. On my PC I could play "Let's Ddance for Sports Relief" but that programme was not available via the Wii. Is there any reason for this? Has the Wii got a smaller stored programme list?
Complain about this comment (Comment number 8)
Comment number 9.
At 27th Mar 2010, U14390976 wrote:This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 9)
Comment number 10.
At 12th May 2010, U14460911 wrote:This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 10)
Comment number 11.
At 12th May 2010, U14460911 wrote:This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 11)
Comment number 12.
At 17th May 2010, Manu wrote:This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 12)
Comment number 13.
At 18th May 2010, KAI wrote:91Èȱ¬ iPlayer does not work with me, since I probably have a German IP address.
Can it be solved by changing? Are there tools or open Poxies or another solutions? Regards Kai [Unsuitable/Broken URL removed by Moderator]
Complain about this comment (Comment number 13)
Comment number 14.
At 20th May 2010, talat wrote:All this user's posts have been removed.Why?
Complain about this comment (Comment number 14)
Comment number 15.
At 5th Oct 2010, abby wrote:This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 15)
Comment number 16.
At 8th Oct 2010, mike2010s wrote:This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 16)
Comment number 17.
At 1st Nov 2010, steve austen wrote:This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 17)