Searching for places on the 91Èȱ¬
were wondering the other day how much people search for local information from the 91Èȱ¬, so as a quick hack we got hold of the top 10,000 search terms from the bbc.co.uk search logs for one day, July 9th. Then using the we extracted any UK place names from the search terms, counted them up and plotted them on a map*. It's just a little thing but we thought it might be interesting.
* though I removed the map from the final rendering, I think it's prettier that way.
Tristan Ferne is Senior Development Producer, R&D, FM&T for Audio & Music Interactive.
Comment number 1.
At 22nd Jul 2009, FishFingers wrote:Yet more evidence that the 91Èȱ¬'s output is London-centric.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 1)
Comment number 2.
At 22nd Jul 2009, TV Licence fee payer against 91Èȱ¬ censorship wrote:1. At 7:38pm on 22 Jul 2009, neiltc13 wrote:
"Yet more evidence that the 91Èȱ¬'s output is London-centric."
Can't agree, if it does show any London-centric bias then it shows a London-centric audience, these results were based on bbc.co.uk search logs not the URL click-through web server results.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 2)
Comment number 3.
At 23rd Jul 2009, hitmouse wrote:"it shows a London-centric audience" - and the reason for this? That the 91Èȱ¬ output is so London-centric that the rest of the country pays less attention.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 3)
Comment number 4.
At 23rd Jul 2009, yhapster wrote:I disagree with the "London-centric audience" statement. Sooooo many people I know from across the country have the 91Èȱ¬ as their homepage, or part of their homepage. I don't live in London but I check London local news regularly because it is the capital city, family & friends live there etc. etc. London will always have the most hits, it makes sense.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 4)
Comment number 5.
At 23rd Jul 2009, mktgDIGITAL wrote:Tristan - it's an interesting take on things, but what does it really tell you and us?
Searches on 91Èȱ¬ are location centric and pretty much follow the population locations - wow that's news worthy. The anomaly for Newquay is probably based on the sad story of the teenager who fell off the cliffs and I think we can all work out the reason for a big result for Glastonbury.
What would be more interesting and certainly a lot more valid, would be to plot the correlation between IP location and location search term.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 5)
Comment number 6.
At 23rd Jul 2009, tristanf wrote:@mktgDIGITAL - I agree and I'm certainly not claiming it tells us anything profound. It really was just a couple of hours of hacking to see what it might throw up. But maybe it points the way to something else- surfacing stories which people think are important or showing up places which the 91Èȱ¬ doesn't have much content about? Maybe we should normalise the map against population density?
Complain about this comment (Comment number 6)
Comment number 7.
At 23rd Jul 2009, cping500 wrote:It's also to do with the two local news rows, sharing local news tv facilities, and the 91Èȱ¬ v the local newspaper publishers which means that there is not a very effective 91Èȱ¬ web local news service apart from crime (though it has become a little more variable recently) There seems little cross platform work even with the major TV local programmes.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 7)
Comment number 8.
At 23rd Jul 2009, TV Licence fee payer against 91Èȱ¬ censorship wrote:In reply to comments @ #3 and 4
Sorry but these are search results, people wanting London-centric information, it's NOT a result based on the number of page hits or article title count etc. In fact if you look at the map and add together all the areas outside of the claimed 'London-centric area' you will see that there are more NON London-centric area searches than there are London-centric...
It's impossible to make a judgement about 91Èȱ¬ content from what people search for, had there been a major story (or even rumour) about - for example - Ludlow and thus a high number of searches using "Ludlow" as a search term would you be claiming that the 91Èȱ¬ was 'Ludlow-centric'?!
Complain about this comment (Comment number 8)
Comment number 9.
At 23rd Jul 2009, Secret Love wrote:Remember the search is based on UK place names ~ how many people put London into a search ? You can understand Glastonbury, but why London ?
91Èȱ¬ coverage is London-centric, whilst some of this is natural given that London is the capital, other parts of it relfect the ease with which reporters can reach London locations. Too often London locations are used to reflect national stories.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 9)
Comment number 10.
At 23rd Jul 2009, Hymagumba wrote:on the subject of searching, have the /topics pages been axed? if so what was the thinking behind this? did they simply not work as intended?
Complain about this comment (Comment number 10)
Comment number 11.
At 23rd Jul 2009, jas wrote:For those obsessed with London centered-ness, look at any population density map; look at any measure of economic output and activity vs. areas on the UK. The only rational conclusion is that the UK would be nothing without the SE of England, so be grateful. It is no surprise that there is so much activity there in almost any field you take the time to look at. I live in the Scottish part of the UK.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 11)
Comment number 12.
At 23rd Jul 2009, Green Soap wrote:Is the choice of date for the map an attempt to justify the 91Èȱ¬ Junketing to Glasto?
Complain about this comment (Comment number 12)
Comment number 13.
At 30th Mar 2010, U14402580 wrote:This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 13)
Comment number 14.
At 12th May 2010, U14460911 wrote:This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 14)
Comment number 15.
At 20th May 2010, magic1001981 wrote:This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 15)
Comment number 16.
At 26th May 2010, sussane sh wrote:This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 16)