91Èȱ¬

« Previous | Main | Next »

bbc.co.uk Service Licence: Initial Feedback & Early Round-Up

Post categories:

Jem Stone Jem Stone | 13:38 UK time, Thursday, 29 May 2008

Update: Nick Reynolds has posted with more reactions here.

Obviously, the document we've been scouring most round our way today is the review of bbc.co.uk by the 91Èȱ¬ Trust. I expect there to be further posts from my colleagues reacting to this in the next day or so. I'm only just getting through what seems to be at least a dozen lengthy PDFs of consultation, review and recommendations. The early press coverage, from what I can tell, has focused on only a small amount of what the Trust had to say about the site. So - if your printers can bear it - it's worth ploughing your way through it.

You can read the document in full, the terms of reference, and supporting evidence on the 91Èȱ¬ Trust site.

Documents summarising the considerable amount of consultation with "institutional stakeholders", the 91Èȱ¬'s Audience Councils and the 91Èȱ¬'s submission itself are also published in full.

As ever, the fullest press coverage (three stories in as many hours earlier today) , which even extended to a . There's also a lengthy piece in .

and are only starting to trickle in. Emily Bell and Patricia Hodgson went head-to-head on Today this morning but the audio for this will vanish into the ether in a few hours. [Update: the audio is now availabele here as an mp3]


-
Read this doc on Scribd:

Update: The 91Èȱ¬ issued a statement in response to the report which is published over at the Press Office site.

Jem Stone is the Portfolio Exec, Social Media in the 91Èȱ¬'s internet group.

Comments

Ìý

More from this blog...

91Èȱ¬ iD

91Èȱ¬ navigation

91Èȱ¬ © 2014 The 91Èȱ¬ is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.