Open Source Consortium Meeting/Backstage Podcast
Post categories: iPlayer,Ìýopen source,Ìýopen standards
| 10:35 UK time, Wednesday, 14 November 2007
I am a newcomer to the 91Èȱ¬'s Future Media Division, and consider myself to be well "behind the curve" on all things webby and technological compared to the clever people who work here.
So I was flattered to be invited to the meeting last week between the 91Èȱ¬'s Tony Ageh (Controller, Internet) and Mark Taylor of the [pictured, right]. The meeting's aim was to have a discussion about the 91Èȱ¬'s iPlayer.
Mark's already been interviewed and there's been from the Open Source Consortium and on blogs.
Last Friday the estimable team recorded a discussion with Mark Taylor, Becky Hogge from the Open Rights Group and Robin Doran, Matthew Browning, Jonathan Tweed and Ben Smith (all 91Èȱ¬ Staff connected to the development of the iPlayer).
This is now available to listen to as a podcast .
If you have any thoughts on the podcast, please do comment.
For me, what was good about the original meeting was its grown-up tone. Some of the more extreme views expressed about the iPlayer seem to be based for example on the belief that rights don't exist or are irrelevant and that rights holders aren't important. So it was good to hear Mark saying that the OSC accepts that rights holders do have legitmate interests that need to be considered.
Tony outlined the iPlayer story to date. I don't want to give away any secrets from a private meeting. But Tony acknowledged that we haven't done ourselves any favours in the way we've explained our decisions about the iPlayer.
The outcome of the meeting was that George Wright, who leads a new development team within FM&T, is going to have more discussions with free and open source software people (some suggested by Mark and the OSC) to see if there are ways we can work together.
I'm hoping to get George to talk about these on the 91Èȱ¬ Internet Blog.
Nick Reynolds is editor, 91Èȱ¬ Internet Blog.
Comments
It's interesting that none of those assembled for the podcast (including 91Èȱ¬ engineers) want DRM in iPlayer.
Perversely (if I understood the comment correctly) the 91Èȱ¬ development team included DRM in iPlayer because they were forced to and to demonstrate how crap it is.
That's +£100m of public money to show that a proprietary technology doesn't work!!
I want my license fee back!
@dogStar
Thanks for your comment on the podcast.
The iPlayer development team did not include DRM in iPlayer to prove it
doesn't work, they included it because it's the only way rights holders
will allow the content to be distributed.
The fact that none of the people in the room want DRM in iPlayer
unfortunately doesn't change that.
Cheers
Jonathan