91Èȱ¬

Here's a wee thought to whet your appetites while we wait for first minister's questions, here at Holyrood.

I'm told there are still big differences among the parties about how to implement the new scheme for MSPs' office allowances.

So big that the prospect now looms that the issue might have to be argued out in the chamber instead of being settled by negotiated agreement.

You'll remember that Sir Alan Langlands chaired a review of allowances.

His team , designed to save money and placate the public.

The big issue dividing the parties is whether to end the present parity of treatment for constituency and regional list MSPs.

Breach fairness

Sir Alan concluded there should be a maximum of £62,000 paid to a constituency member's staff team - with list members restricted to £45,000.

Those supporting this position argue that constituency members have a far bigger case load. Those against say it would create two castes of MSP and breach basic fairness.

Very broadly, the Tories and the SNP favour parity. Labour backs the Langlands position. The Liberal Democrats are seeking a compromise.

The parties have perhaps a fortnight or three weeks in which to sort this. Otherwise, we're back to what happened in 1999 when MSPs were left arguing about their own cash on the floor of the chamber.

I'm told all sides want a deal. One participant said the talks have been serious - but sensible with no "bawling or shouting". Save that for FMQs, eh?

• Bookmark with:
• |
• |
• |
• |
• - What's this?