91Èȱ¬

91Èȱ¬ BLOGS - Open Secrets
« Previous | Main | Next »

What spooks waste or recycle

Post categories:

Martin Rosenbaum | 11:00 UK time, Wednesday, 10 February 2010

The security service MI5 is producing twice as much waste as it was five years ago.

As a security body, has an from the Freedom of Information Act. But it can't be excluded from the , which implement a on access to environmental information held by public authorities.

This means that MI5 has to be prepared to release some environmental data, such as its recycling rate, where it would not adversely affect national security or come under other EIR exceptions.

Man emptying his rubbishMI5 has told me, in response to an EIR request, that in 2009 it recycled 56% of the 1,546 tonnes of waste that it created. This is a major improvement on its recycling rate of 33% in 2006. But it only takes the service back to where it was more or less in 2004, when it had a rate of 55% - although this was on about half as much waste at 570 tonnes.

So although the security service is recycling at the same rate as five years previously, it is producing twice as much waste. However, a recyling rate of 56% is respectable compared to the . Presumably the top secret memos get shredded before they go in the recycling bin.

The data released also shows that MI5 has faced a remarkable increase in its electricity prices. In 2009 it consumed 32.4 million kWh, at a cost of £3.6 million, an average cost of 11 pence per kWh. But back in 2004 it was consuming 23.6 million kWh at a quarter of the 2009 annual cost, just £890,000 - representing just 3.8 pence per kWh.

If they've all been spending their time watching Spooks, they should surely be told to turn those televisions off - it's expensive!

Most of the data MI5 has sent me has also been posted on its , except that the website omits the 2009 recycling rate of 56% and waste figure of 1,546 tonnes.

Comments

or to comment.

91Èȱ¬ iD

91Èȱ¬ navigation

91Èȱ¬ © 2014 The 91Èȱ¬ is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.