I've just spotted recent decision from the Information Commissioner which condemns what was then the Department for Constitutional Affairs for taking the 'unreasonable length of time' of almost seven months to weigh up whether it was in the public interest to disclose a particular report.
Jump to more content from this blog
A blog about freedom of information, written by the 91Èȱ¬'s Martin Rosenbaum.
For the latest updates across 91Èȱ¬ blogs,
visit the Blogs homepage.
You can stay up to date with Open Secrets via these feeds.
Open Secrets Feed(RSS)
Open Secrets Feed(ATOM)
If you aren't sure what RSS is you'll find useful.
|
Nick Robinson: |
 |
|
Douglas Fraser: |
 |
|
Brian Taylor: |
 |
 |
|
Richard Black: |
 |
|
Jonathan Amos: |
 |
91Èȱ¬ © 2014 The 91Èȱ¬ is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.
This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.
°ä´Ç³¾³¾±ð²Ô³Ù²õÌýÌý Post your comment
What abject hypocricy from the Information Commissioner.
They have been "considering" a case I referred to them for almost three years and every few months when I ask about it, I am told they "hope to be able to issue a decision shortly".
Considering the public authority is the Cabinet Office, I already know they will not uphold my complaint, so you would think they would just end it, wouldn't you?
On May 3rd 2007 I wrote to the ICO to refer what I considered an incorrect response from the 91Èȱ¬ to an FOI request I made.
A week or two later I received a letter from the ICO saying they had assigned a case officer to my complaint.
I have heard nothing from them until about 2 weeks ago, when I received an email from them stating that they apologise for the delay, which is due to the large number of cases they receive. They also stated they have set up specialist 'teams' within their office and - good news! - my case has now been assigned a case-officer... in their 'central government team'.
So, in 9 months, my case has gone kind of backwards and sideways within the ICO. Backwards, because I had been assigned a case officer, but then it appears I no longer did have a case officer, but they've now (9 months later) given me a case officer. And sideways, because I've been given a case officer in their 'specialist' central government team. Why has my case, which involves the 91Èȱ¬, and has absolutely nothing to do with central government, been referred to that team???
I despair. I genuinely do...