91Èȱ¬

91Èȱ¬ BLOGS - Open Secrets
« Previous | Main | Next »

How this weblog works

Martin Rosenbaum | 14:29 UK time, Thursday, 18 May 2006

When you come to the front page you’ll see the latest entries, the most recent at the top. Scroll down for previous entries.

On the right hand side there’s a calendar. When any date is blue, that means there was an entry on that day. Click on the date and the page will display that day's items.

Underneath each entry are two words - "permalink" and "comments".
• "Permalink" means "permanent link", and is useful if you want to bookmark a particular entry or send it by email to someone else.
• "Comments" means just that. Click on it, and you can add your comments to that particular entry.

Clicking on an entry's headline takes you to that item's own page, where it is printed in full with all the comments on it. If you want to go back to the main index page, you can click either the words "Open Secrets" at the top of the page, or on the word "MAIN" which you'll find on a beige bar. On that bar you might also see the words "PREVIOUS" and "NEXT" - these take you directly to other entries in chronological order.

We are aiming to publish as many comments as possible, though unfortunately we can't guarantee to publish every one. Comments will only be published after we've had a chance to read them first.

°ä´Ç³¾³¾±ð²Ô³Ù²õÌýÌý Post your comment

  • 1.
  • At 11:44 PM on 16 Oct 2006,
  • mark kaye wrote:

I would like to know the cost so far, to the license fee payer, of the continuing reticence of the 91Èȱ¬ to issue the Balen Report to the media.

  • 2.
  • At 06:19 PM on 17 Oct 2006,
  • Martin Rosenbaum wrote:

Mark -

I don't know the answer. If you want to find out, I recommend you visit this page - /foi/foirequest.shtml - which explains how you can best make an FOI request to the 91Èȱ¬.

  • 3.
  • At 06:10 PM on 25 Jan 2007,
  • martin mann wrote:

The FOI Bill is alarming, for very obvious reasons. Just another example of erosion of the principle, or something more sinister? It might not be the latter, but should the bill or something like it become law it will likely be possible, as with other recent laws, in particular anti-terrorism laws, to use it to both the public and private individuals' detriment.

  • 4.
  • At 05:27 PM on 19 May 2007,
  • Stephen Brabbins wrote:

This week's (w/e 19 May, 2007) Commons vote to exempt MPs from the Freedom of Information Act has to be the most shameful and destructive example of how Parliamentary democracy should NOT work.

Please can somebody point us to a Website where we may register our alarm and opposition to this insanity?

Or is it true that 'some are more equal than others' after all?

  • 5.
  • At 12:36 PM on 18 Sep 2007,
  • Stuart Moore wrote:

My local council pays the traveling to work expenses for some of it's employees, seeing as I'm the one paying for these travel expenses I asked my local council for the figures which showed how much of my money they had spent paying for this expensive concession. They wrote back informing me that it would take one person a week to collate that information which would cost more than the £450 threshold, so it would seem that information is free if your willing to pay for it.
The local council involved "The isles of Scilly"

  • 6.
  • At 05:21 PM on 21 Sep 2007,
  • Eric Topping wrote:

Do MPs escape tax on expenses they claim without receipts being required?
Does the Inland Revenue check on the validity of expenses,given the fact they are normally tax free,which means they can not only obtain illegal expenses but escape 40% tax on them as well!

  • 7.
  • At 08:10 PM on 27 Mar 2008,
  • Arthur Nicholls wrote:

The ongoing saga of stopping the publishing of MPs expenses "allowances", by Gorbals Mick (leader of the labour party mafia) and his mottly committee, by suggesting that it would put them in danger, the only danger they would be in is the loss of their seats when their constituents find out what conniving, underhanded cheats they really are.

This post is closed to new comments.

91Èȱ¬ iD

91Èȱ¬ navigation

91Èȱ¬ © 2014 The 91Èȱ¬ is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.