91Èȱ¬

91Èȱ¬ BLOGS - Nick Robinson's Newslog
« Previous | Main | Next »

Out of the frying pan

Nick Robinson | 11:27 UK time, Tuesday, 20 February 2007

pancakes.jpgFinal proof that it is MPs and not journalists who are the biggest tossers came this morning.

A media team of Shrove Tuesday tossers was beaten by a group of Labour MPs led by Lindsay Hoyle. Far be it for me to complain about cheating but allow me to observe that each member of the MPs' relay team had their own pan rather than passing the pan as the rules required. In addition, our freshly made pancake was less aerodynamic than their mass produced, straight from the packet pancake.

Bad loser? What do you mean?!

Comments

  • 1.
  • At on 20 Feb 2007,
  • Jel wrote:

Cripes!

  • 2.
  • At on 20 Feb 2007,
  • wrote:

Shouldn't that be "crepes"?

  • 3.
  • At on 20 Feb 2007,
  • Andy wrote:

Nick - are you really suprised that the Labour team changed the rules on which a "win" is measured? Hasn't Gordon been doing that for most of his reports over the last few years?!!

  • 4.
  • At on 20 Feb 2007,
  • Chris C wrote:

Nice outfit Nick

I dare you to wear it on the 10 o'clock news !!!

  • 5.
  • At on 20 Feb 2007,
  • Peter wrote:

The 91Èȱ¬ obviously arent working you hard enough Nick!!

  • 6.
  • At on 20 Feb 2007,
  • Craig wrote:

I expect the MPs will be claiming the distance they travelled during the race on their expenses forms...

  • 7.
  • At on 20 Feb 2007,
  • Richard Morris wrote:

Why do I think John Prescott should have led the MPs team?

  • 8.
  • At on 20 Feb 2007,
  • Ewan Mac Mahon wrote:

Now we know you're working for number ten - they've even sponsored your apron!

  • 9.
  • At on 20 Feb 2007,
  • Michael wrote:

Well done Nick for taking part.

You are used to getting the MP's to jump from the pan into the fire in your interviews and commentary. However, your skills did not work today !!

  • 10.
  • At on 20 Feb 2007,
  • Mark wrote:

So, today you were "Shrove Tuesday tossers"... Does that mean that when it isnt Shrove Tuesday you are just "tossers"? :-)

  • 11.
  • At on 20 Feb 2007,
  • T Wood wrote:

Not surprising as journalists are masters of criticism and MP's are masters of gaining position, foregone conclusion!

  • 12.
  • At on 20 Feb 2007,
  • Anita wrote:

I really do think you are compromising your political objectivity by being so friendly with all these politicians, all the time. Is it not your role to dispassionately report such events rather than involving yourself?How could you ever report on a scandal involving Lindsay Hoyle, for example, now that she appeares to be your best buddy? The sycophancy is so nauseating, remain semi-detached and then you may regain some credibility.

  • 13.
  • At on 20 Feb 2007,
  • wrote:

I'm amazed this example of sleaze hasn't made Guido's site yet... must have been a heavy night!

  • 14.
  • At on 20 Feb 2007,
  • ben miller wrote:

I bet the MPs made the best tossers.

  • 15.
  • At on 20 Feb 2007,
  • dodo wrote:

Which lawn were you on? from pics it looks like hacks were made to run up hill while the hachets ran down . . .

  • 16.
  • At on 20 Feb 2007,
  • Gospel of Enoch wrote:

I'm deeply depressed by this. This sums up Labours attitude to the EU constitution: Ignore the legality and carry on regardless. If they can't play fair in a pancake race, what chance in a referendum?

  • 17.
  • At on 20 Feb 2007,
  • Jeremy wrote:

Why were you the player chosen to be "number 10" in preference to all the others?

  • 18.
  • At on 20 Feb 2007,
  • Michael wrote:

Nick,

Well done for taking part in this event.

You are used to getting MP's to jump out of the pan into the fire with your interviews and commentary. However, your skill obviously did not work today.

  • 19.
  • At on 20 Feb 2007,
  • wrote:

Don't sweat it Nick, Hoyle's lot are blatantly just a flash in the pan

  • 20.
  • At on 20 Feb 2007,
  • Chris Linthwaite wrote:

So you lost then Nick

Where is that Jeremy Paxman when you need him?

  • 21.
  • At on 20 Feb 2007,
  • SJH wrote:

I see you are using newly-minted Parliamentary language

  • 22.
  • At on 20 Feb 2007,
  • Meir Avrahami wrote:

"who are the biggest t*ssers"

Please - this is the 91Èȱ¬

Yes I know it's not what it once was but really

  • 23.
  • At on 20 Feb 2007,
  • wrote:

Isn't "Pancake Day" a better description? Governments shouldn't really be endorsing religious days like "Shrove Tuesday" should they?

  • 24.
  • At on 20 Feb 2007,
  • Rahim Shabbir wrote:

We Love You Nick!
Keep up The Good Work
Sexi Outfit Lol

  • 25.
  • At on 20 Feb 2007,
  • Sarah wrote:

Nice to see the dignity of the journalistic profession being upheld! Nice pinny ^-^

  • 26.
  • At on 20 Feb 2007,
  • charles wrote:

oh it doesn't matter to me whether you win or lose at pancake tossing Nick, you're still my hero for the incredibly courageous pair of questions you asked Bush back in the Autumn of '06

  • 27.
  • At on 20 Feb 2007,
  • Jeff Parry wrote:

Evidently the media team failed to field the correct team of Tossers. Maybe they were still in the pub trying to get to the bottom of the story.

  • 28.
  • At on 20 Feb 2007,
  • Nick Thornsby wrote:

Goodness me Nick I think I might get myself a job at the beeb- alps one week then back to westminster to have a pancake tossing competition!!! I would have guessed the MP's would have been the biggest tossers anyway!!!!!!!!

Got to go my pancakes are ready Nick!!

  • 29.
  • At on 21 Feb 2007,
  • Mark wrote:

Finally, photographs of people doing jobs they can probably handle. Or can they?

  • 30.
  • At on 21 Feb 2007,
  • wrote:

"Final proof that it is MPs and not journalists who are the biggest tossers came this morning."

Nick

I thought this was you journalists' working assumption anyway.

  • 31.
  • At on 22 Feb 2007,
  • Andy wrote:

Anita, you may like to know that Linsey Hoyle is a man. Is it ok for Nick to be close in that case?

How else is he supposed to get to the real story without getting to know MP's - it's the only practical way.

This post is closed to new comments.

91Èȱ¬ iD

91Èȱ¬ navigation

91Èȱ¬ © 2014 The 91Èȱ¬ is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.