91Èȱ¬

91Èȱ¬ BLOGS - Nick Robinson's Newslog
« Previous | Main | Next »

Two Clarkes

Nick Robinson | 11:52 UK time, Wednesday, 28 June 2006

Standby for a tale of two Clarkes at PMQs. David Cameron will surely quote Charles Clarke's claim that Tony Blair has lost direction, purpose and leadership and Tony Blair will surely retort with by promising a British Bill of Rights in place of the foreign-inspired Human Rights Act.

Comments

  • 1.
  • At on 28 Jun 2006,
  • wrote:

One out of two ain't great. You didn't predict the Robinson. How do you feel about being quoted by Cameron?

  • 2.
  • At on 28 Jun 2006,
  • wrote:

Never mind who quotes who, when will somebody call a halt to these planted "questions" from Labour backbenchers, the sole purpose of which is to give TB an opportunity to quote a few more statistics and look wonderful for a minute.

It's not big, it's not clever and it perverts the course of what should be a serious opportunity to question the Prime Minister.

BTW, does Mr Robinson agree with me that, describing himself on a recent repeat of "University Challenge" as "A poor man's Andrew Marr" is an act of modesty above and beyond the call of duty?

  • 3.
  • At on 28 Jun 2006,
  • Gary Elsby wrote:

'I want to remove your Human Rights'

Forgive me for being a bit picky and choosy, but this is the last thing I would say if I was going into an election and asking the proletariat to vote for me.

Gary

  • 4.
  • At on 28 Jun 2006,
  • Barry wrote:

He doesn't want to remove your human rights, Gary, he wants the Act to reflect the feelings of the people. At present, the people feel that the Human Rights Act is actually taking away the rights of the people, but protecting the yobs, felons, murderers and terrorists. I will certainly vote for this man, and I believe a majority of the country will agree with me.

  • 5.
  • At on 28 Jun 2006,
  • Tom Maxwell wrote:

PMQs is theatre it's not a serious examination of the Prime Minister or his Government.

Planted questions are part and parcel of the theatre and you can tell when a Prime Minister is rattled when he starts asking the Leader of HM's Opposition questions TOTALLY unrelated to the question he's just been asked.

Wilson resigned out of the blue and is remembered with affection by all.

Thatcher was ousted and is remembered, by her party at least, with affection.

Blair is lame & cornered and everyone will breath a huge sigh of relief when he's gone.

  • 6.
  • At on 29 Jun 2006,
  • Russell Long wrote:

'I want to remove your Human Rights'

Forgive me for being a bit picky and choosy, but this is the last thing I would say if I was going into an election and asking the proletariat to vote for me.

Gary"

I suspect that you are deluded over the type of interest this will demonstrate amongst what you quaintly term the 'proletariat'. Will they say "Oh my! I am now oppressed!" or will they say "Hurrah! One in the eye for the Frogs, get your thieving hands off my country!"
I bet you £20 it's the latter.

  • 7.
  • At on 29 Jun 2006,
  • Gary Elsby stoke-on-trent wrote:

It appears that I have got Dave's Human Rights ACT argument all wrong.

Please forgive me.

I take it that Dave's Conservative party, want to give me MORE!, and not LESS, Human Rights.

I see. It's becoming clear to me now.
How stupid of me to get this wrong.
They obviously love the EU more than I originally thought.

My apologies to everyone who believes this story.
Blame the press.
Gary

  • 8.
  • At on 29 Jun 2006,
  • George Hinton wrote:

Cameron has got it wrong, we do not need a "Rights" bill or anything else resembling such. Bills like that are passed by autarchic states, as it allows the state total control over the people. What is granted can always be taken away if the people misbehave. Rather like the quote from Brecht? after the East German uprising, that perhaps the state should do away with the people and try again. We needs to be done is to get rid of the ECHR and regain our original laws which are prefectly adequate.

This post is closed to new comments.

91Èȱ¬ iD

91Èȱ¬ navigation

91Èȱ¬ © 2014 The 91Èȱ¬ is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.