Your Letters
15:17 UK time, Monday, 31 March 2008
Regarding the front page. Bigger format, easier to read, less apparent content. Tabloid journalism at the 91Èȱ¬?
Sharon, Portsmouth, UK
Why? Why change the news layout again? (Read here to find out.) The last one was easy to read and didn't require scrolling around. Now I find it too big and "in your face". About as welcome as a Parking Fine. Please change it back, hopefully by popular demand.
NW, London
I like the 91Èȱ¬ website. It has fewer annoying adverts. (Please note my excellent grammar - I didn't say less).
Gareth, Tokyo, Japan
This is a plot isn't it? You've introduced your "" to take our minds off Heathrow.
S Carr, Dublin
Oooh, the is all shiny and new. Was it too much to expect the same for you, dear Monitor? No spring clean this year then.
Imogen, London
Whoa! Who's done surgery on my favourite ? I feel all weird, everything's different and "show-offy'". Ahh, except for the good old monitor. You'll never change will you? Like a big brother winner you'll always stay simple. The reliable monitor in this internet of chaos. Thank you monitor. You're a credit to the web.
Hennell, Lincoln, UK
I've just read that the coroner of the £7m inquiry into the death of has summed up that she wasn't killed by the Royal family or MI6 after hearing all of the witnesses and examining all of the evidence .
Well he would say that wouldn't he?
Jonathan McAlroy, London
If you had published the 91Èȱ¬ News website item "Pairs of rooks can team up to get to tasty nibbles" (March 31st) just one day later, I'd never have believed this research on feeding birds, as conducted by a Dr .
Chris, Cambridge UK
Re: " wins shotgun fight." A good example of a story less interesting than the headlines promises.
Bob, Glasgow
I read Paper Monitor. I reflected on the indightment of letters unworthy of publication. I recalled how many of my own letters have gone unpublished. Then I had a little cry in a corner. I hope you're happy now.
Susannah, Northampton
The 
