91Èȱ¬

« Previous | Main | Next »

Fallen foul of the 91Èȱ¬ blog's profanity filter?

Jennifer Tracey | 16:05 UK time, Tuesday, 19 August 2008

Have you spent three hours writing out your vital and timely sque scoop for iPM to investigate, only to try posting it and been greeted with 'html invalid' or 'it has failed our profanity filter'?

(Just a thought - you might want to email us if it's, like, one of those old, bring-down-president/prime minister scandal type tales...)

Well, huge apologies and thanks to those who've emailed in and commented on the blog. 91Èȱ¬ tech bloggites are working to fix the problem. In the meantime they say avoid ampersands. In fact, not only &, but also /, and even " " and ! - this should help fend off the 'html invalid' response at least.

The profanity filter is a bit more of a mystery. Email us if you just can't get through. OR - share what you know of blog software, and suggest a fix! Only joking...or am I...

And here's hoping this posts okay, now that I've used everything I've told you not to.

91Èȱ¬ iD

91Èȱ¬ navigation

91Èȱ¬ © 2014 The 91Èȱ¬ is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.