Stephen Fry - host of QI
I have always revered the wit and astoundingly vast brain of . On the 91Èȱ¬ TV comedy quiz show QI he displays the extraordinary range of his expert understanding on the most obscure of subjects.
He does occasionallyÌýadmit that he has little helpers who rummage around in the oft unswept nooks and crannies of the human library of knowledgeÌýtoÌýdust down a factual gem or two on his behalf. Even soÌýyou cannot fail to be impressed.
But suddenly my idolatry of this man was shaken. On readingÌýthe latest instalment of , IÌý spotted his use of a word in the English language that I feel must be exposed as erroneous.
I better say right away I am standing firmly on the pedestal of pedantry but I thought a man as well versed in the use of words as Mr. Fry might be standing shoulder to shoulder with me on this one. Yet, it appears not to be so.
As in QI where in each series a letter of the alphabet is chosen to select a topic, all theÌýsections in this bookÌýare a C word.ÌýBut one stood out as I devoured his writing.ÌýMy bête noir of our vocabulary - celibacy.
He recounts how he once wanted to write about celibacy, noting that:
"a life without sex...offered numerous benefits. The celibate life allowed productivity..."
The problem is that is not the proper meaning. To abstain from sex is .ÌýAccording to the online the definition is:
ÌýThe state of living unmarried. [f. L. ³¦Ã¦±ô¾±²útus in same sense, f. ³¦Ã¦±ô±ð²ú²õ, ³¦Ã¦±ô¾±²ú-em unmarried, single: . (°äæ±ô±ð²ú²õ, and its noun of state ³¦Ã¦±ô¾±²útus, are the only cognate words found in Latin).]Ìý
still uphold this traditional definition of the word.Ìý, something that is rather delightfully called 'clerical continence'. Later of course Catholic clergy were expected not to marry in the first place. You can see how easily chastity and celibacy came to be interchangeable in conversation.
Bah Tish Humbug!ÌýWhat is all the fuss about I hear you cry. Actually I can happily argue against myself on this one. I doÌýbelieve the English language is a living thing and meanings do change.
Stephen Fry would be happy to be called 'gay' whether in the 1930's sense or that of theÌý1980's. I suppose my point is we should at least know what the words originally meant. 'Wicked' to a teenager of today is anything but sinful.
I of course revere Stephen as much as ever.
If I dare not mock a fellow Englishman, nay a national treasure no less,Ìýat least I can laugh at the mangling of our language by those forÌýwhom it is not the native tongue. So in the style of QI I leave you with this little morsel from a notice board in a hotel with a sunnier clime than ours...
If you wish breakfast, lift the telephone and our waitress will arrive. This will be enough to bring up your food.
Thank you and goodnight.Ìý
Normal service will be resumed in the form of Inside Out which returns to your screens on October 18 2010.